2002 Mitsubishi Minicab 660 V type Specs


OVERVIEW

With a fuel consumption of 39.2 mpg US - 47 mpg UK - 6.0 L/100km, a weight of 1653 lbs (750 kg), the Mitsubishi Minicab 660 V type has a SOHC12 valve 3 cylinder engine, a Regular gasoline engine 3G83. This engine 3G83 produces a maximum power of 48.6 PS (48 bhp - 35.7 kW) at 6000 rpm and a maximum torque of 61.7 Nm (45.5 lb.ft - 6.3 kg.m) at 4000 rpm. The engine power is transmitted to the road by the four wheel drive (4WD) with a 5MT gearbox. For stopping power, the Mitsubishi Minicab 660 V type braking system includes Leading trailing drum brake at the rear and Disk at the front. Chassis details - Mitsubishi Minicab 660 V type has semicircle leaf spring rear suspension and McPherson strut coil spring front suspension for road holding and ride confort.

Add to compare list

GENERAL INFORMATION
Complectation Name660 V type
Period of ProductionJan 2002 - Jul 2002
Drive Wheels - Traction - Drivetrain4WD
Body TypeCommercial Van
Transmission Gearbox - Number of Speeds5MT
Engine Size - Displacement - Engine Capacity657 cm3 or 40 cu-in
Frame NameGD-U62T

MITSUBISHI MINICAB 660 V TYPE SIZE, DIMENSIONS AND WEIGHT
Exterior Length339.5 cm or 133.66 inches
Exterior Width147.5 cm or 58.07 inches
Exterior Height179 cm or 70.47 inches
Wheelbase220 cm or 86.61 inches
Ride Height - Ground Clearance15 cm or 5.9 inches
Weight750 kg or 1653 lbs
Num. of Seats2
Num. of Doors2
Minimum Turning Circle - Turning Diameter, m4
Fuel Tank Capacity10.5 US gallons
8.7 UK gallons
40 L

MITSUBISHI MINICAB 660 V TYPE ENGINE TECHNICAL DATA
Engine Code3G83
Maximum Power - Output - Horsepower48.6 PS or 48 bhp or 35.7 kW
Maximum Power RPM6000 rpm
Maximum Torque61.7 Nm or 45.5 lb.ft or 6.3 kg.m
Maximum Torque RPM4000 rpm
Engine Type - Number of CylindersSOHC12 valve 3 cylinder
Fuel TypeRegular gasoline
LEVlean burn MVV
Fuel Consumption (10/15 mode)39.2 mpg US
47 mpg UK
6.0 L/100km

MITSUBISHI MINICAB 660 V TYPE SUSPENSION
Front Brakes - Disc DimensionsDisk
Rear Brakes - Disс DimensionsLeading trailing drum brake
Front SuspensionMcPherson strut coil spring
Rear Suspensionsemicircle leaf spring
Tyres - Rims Dimensions145 R12-6PR
Aluminium DiskStandart

MITSUBISHI MINICAB 660 V TYPE EXTERIOR
SunroofNo
Tilt SunroofNo
Twin SunroofNo
Front SpoilerNo
Rear SpoilerNo
Power Adjustable Door MirrorsNo
Xenon LampsNo
Front Fog LampsNo
Rear Fog LampsNo
Cornering LampsNo
Ultraviolet Glass ProtectionNo
Roof RailNo

MITSUBISHI MINICAB 660 V TYPE INTERIOR
Power WindowNo
Power SteeringOption
TachometerNo
Centralized Door LockNo
Keyless EnterNo
Right Hand DriveStandart
Left Hand DriveNo
Leather WindingNo
Adjustable SteeringNo
Wood PanelNo
Cruise ControlNo
Leather SeatNo
Power Adjustable SeatsNo
Reclining SeatsNo
Removable SeatsNo
Turning SeatsNo

MITSUBISHI MINICAB 660 V TYPE SAFETY
Drivers AirbagOption
Passengers AirbagOption
Side AirbagNo
Side Impact BarStandart
TCSNo
Break AssistNo
Parking RadarNo
Central Power Window ControlNo
Additional Stop LightOption

AMENITY
CoolerNo
Automatic Air ConditioningNo
Twin Conditioning SystemNo
Air PurifierNo
RadioOption
Autoreverse CasetteNo
CD PlayerNo
CD ChangerNo
MD PalyerNo
MD ChangerNo

OTHER
LSDOption
Front StabilizerNo
Rear StablilizerNo
Special EquipmentNo


- Present
- Option
- Not Present (or Dealer Option)



More photos Mitsubishi Minicab


By Brian Wong, Reviewed by: Kurt Niebuhr, Updated on April 16, 2024
πŸ“Œ Introduction to the 2002 Mitsubishi Minicab 660 V-Type
πŸ“Œ Engine Specifications
πŸ“Œ Dimensions and Sizes
πŸ“Œ Fuel Tank Capacity
πŸ“Œ Fuel Consumption and Efficiency
πŸ“Œ Engine Details
πŸ“Œ Fuel Economy in Miles Per Gallon (MPG)
πŸ“Œ Wheel Specifications
πŸ“Œ Trim Levels and Options
πŸ“Œ Interior and Cargo Space
πŸ“Œ Safety Features
πŸ“Œ Performance and Handling
πŸ“Œ Maintenance and Ownership Costs
πŸ“Œ User Reviews and Feedback
πŸ“Œ Conclusion: The 2002 Mitsubishi Minicab 660 V-Type in Summary
πŸ“Œ FAQ: Common Questions About the Mitsubishi Minicab 660 V Type

Introduction to the 2002 Mitsubishi Minicab 660 V-Type

The 2002 Mitsubishi Minicab 660 V Type was a noteworthy addition to the Mitsubishi lineup during its production period, which spanned from January 2002 to July 2002. This compact commercial van came equipped with a range of specifications and features tailored to meet the needs of various consumers, especially those seeking a versatile and fuel-efficient vehicle for their business or personal use.

One of the standout features of this model was its drivetrain configuration, offering 4WD (four-wheel drive) capabilities. This provided enhanced traction and control, making it suitable for various driving conditions, including challenging terrains.

The vehicle boasted a 5-speed manual transmission gearbox, giving drivers the flexibility to manage their speed and power efficiently. Powered by a 657 cm3 engine with the code 3G83, the 2002 Mitsubishi Minicab 660 V Type delivered a respectable output of 48.6 PS (48 bhp) at 6000 rpm, making it an efficient performer for its class.

In terms of size and dimensions, this Minicab exhibited a compact yet practical build. Its exterior dimensions measured approximately 339.5 cm in length, 147.5 cm in width, and 179 cm in height. With a wheelbase of 220 cm and a ground clearance of 15 cm, it struck a balance between maneuverability and clearance.

Weighing in at 750 kg, this vehicle was relatively lightweight, further contributing to its fuel efficiency. The 2002 Mitsubishi Minicab 660 V Type accommodated two passengers in its 2-door configuration. Its tight turning circle of 4 meters made it easy to navigate in confined spaces.

For fuel capacity, the model came equipped with a 10.5 US gallon (8.7 UK gallon) tank, providing ample range for both city and highway driving. This, combined with its fuel-efficient engine, made it an economical choice for daily commutes or cargo transportation.

In terms of safety, the model offered optional driver and passenger airbags, as well as standard side impact bars, enhancing occupant protection.

While not equipped with an extensive list of amenities, the 2002 Mitsubishi Minicab 660 V Type prioritized practicality and efficiency over luxurious features. It was a straightforward and reliable option for those in need of a dependable workhorse.

This brief introduction outlines the key specifications and characteristics of the 2002 Mitsubishi Minicab 660 V Type, offering a glimpse into its practicality and suitability for a range of driving needs.

Engine Specifications

The 2002 Mitsubishi Minicab 660 V Type was equipped with a compact yet capable engine that powered this commercial van during its production period. This engine, bearing the code 3G83, played a pivotal role in defining the performance and efficiency of the vehicle.

The 3G83 engine was a 657 cm3 (cubic centimeter) powerplant, delivering a maximum output of 48.6 PS (48 brake horsepower) at 6000 rpm (revolutions per minute). This power output, while modest, was well-suited for the Minicab's intended purpose as a practical and efficient urban workhorse.

Torque, another crucial aspect of engine performance, was rated at 61.7 Nm (Newton-meters) or 45.5 lb.ft (pound-feet) at 4000 rpm. This torque figure provided sufficient low-end grunt, ensuring that the Minicab could handle the demands of city driving, including start-stop traffic and light cargo hauling.

The engine featured a Single Overhead Cam (SOHC) configuration with 12 valves distributed across its three cylinders. This design aimed to strike a balance between power and efficiency while maintaining reliability.

The fuel type for the 2002 Mitsubishi Minicab 660 V Type was regular gasoline, a readily available and cost-effective option for everyday driving. Additionally, the vehicle incorporated a Lean Burn Multi-Valve (MVV) system, which contributed to its overall fuel efficiency.

When it came to fuel consumption, this Minicab demonstrated impressive frugality. In the 10/15 mode, it achieved a fuel economy rating of 39.2 mpg (miles per gallon) in the United States, 47 mpg in the United Kingdom, or 6.0 L/100km (liters per 100 kilometers). These figures reflected its economical nature, making it a budget-friendly choice for both personal and commercial use.

In summary, the 2002 Mitsubishi Minicab 660 V Type was powered by the 3G83 engine, which, despite its modest power output, delivered reliable and efficient performance. Its balance of power and fuel economy made it a practical choice for those seeking an economical commercial van for urban tasks.

Dimensions and Sizes

The dimensions and sizes of the 2002 Mitsubishi Minicab 660 V Type were carefully designed to strike a balance between compactness and practicality. These measurements contributed to the vehicle's agility, making it well-suited for navigating urban environments and crowded streets.

Starting with its exterior dimensions, the Minicab boasted a length of approximately 339.5 cm (133.66 inches). This compact length allowed for easy maneuverability and parking in tight spaces, a valuable trait for a commercial van.

In terms of width, the vehicle measured around 147.5 cm (58.07 inches). This moderate width ensured that it could comfortably traverse standard lanes while still providing ample cargo space within the compact frame.

The Minicab's height was approximately 179 cm (70.47 inches), offering a low profile that further enhanced its stability and ease of use, especially in windy conditions.

With a wheelbase of 220 cm (86.61 inches), the vehicle struck a balance between stability and maneuverability. The longer wheelbase contributed to a smoother ride and enhanced interior space.

The ground clearance or ride height of the 2002 Mitsubishi Minicab 660 V Type was approximately 15 cm (5.9 inches). This clearance was sufficient for urban driving and occasional light off-road use while ensuring easy entry and exit for passengers and cargo loading.

In terms of weight, the Minicab tipped the scales at around 750 kg (1653 lbs). This lightweight design not only contributed to its fuel efficiency but also made it easier to handle in various driving scenarios.

The Minicab was configured as a two-door vehicle, accommodating two passengers comfortably. Its compact size and minimalistic design focused on utility and efficiency.

Additionally, the vehicle featured a tight turning circle with a minimum turning diameter of 4 meters. This feature allowed for sharp turns and easy navigation in congested urban areas.

In summary, the dimensions and sizes of the 2002 Mitsubishi Minicab 660 V Type were tailored to meet the demands of urban driving and cargo transport. Its compact exterior, combined with a well-thought-out interior layout, made it a practical choice for those seeking efficiency and maneuverability in a commercial van.

Fuel Tank Capacity

The 2002 Mitsubishi Minicab 660 V Type featured a practical and adequately sized fuel tank, aligning with its purpose as a versatile and efficient commercial van. The fuel tank capacity of this model provided a good balance between range and fuel efficiency.

While specific measurements may vary depending on the region and units of measurement, the typical fuel tank capacity for this Minicab was approximately 10.5 US gallons (8.7 UK gallons or 40 liters). This fuel tank size allowed the vehicle to carry a sufficient amount of fuel to support daily commutes, city driving, and light cargo transport.

The advantage of this fuel tank capacity was that it struck a balance between fuel efficiency and the need for a reasonable driving range. With the 2002 Mitsubishi Minicab 660 V Type's economical engine and compact size, the contents of the tank could provide a substantial range before needing a refill.

The fuel tank capacity was well-suited for urban and suburban driving, allowing operators to complete their daily tasks with fewer stops for refueling. This feature was particularly beneficial for commercial use, where efficiency and productivity were paramount.

In summary, the 2002 Mitsubishi Minicab 660 V Type offered a practical fuel tank capacity that catered to the vehicle's intended urban and commercial applications. It struck a balance between fuel efficiency and driving range, making it a reliable choice for those seeking economical transportation and cargo-hauling capabilities.

Fuel Consumption and Efficiency

The 2002 Mitsubishi Minicab 660 V Type was celebrated for its fuel efficiency and economical operation, making it a practical choice for both personal and commercial use. Its design and engineering aimed to deliver impressive fuel consumption figures, ensuring that owners could maximize their fuel savings.

The Minicab was powered by a 657 cm3 engine, featuring a Lean Burn Multi-Valve (MVV) system. This system optimized the combustion process, enhancing fuel efficiency and reducing emissions. As a result, the Minicab demonstrated remarkable fuel economy in various driving scenarios.

In the 10/15 mode, a commonly used testing method, the 2002 Mitsubishi Minicab 660 V Type achieved impressive fuel consumption figures. It recorded approximately 39.2 mpg (miles per gallon) in the United States, 47 mpg in the United Kingdom, or 6.0 L/100km (liters per 100 kilometers).

These fuel consumption figures highlighted the Minicab's efficiency in both city and highway driving. Its economical nature made it a cost-effective option for daily commutes, commercial deliveries, and other urban tasks. Additionally, its lightweight design further contributed to its impressive fuel efficiency, allowing owners to make the most of each tank of fuel.

Overall, the 2002 Mitsubishi Minicab 660 V Type excelled in fuel consumption and efficiency, making it a practical and budget-friendly choice for those seeking an economical vehicle without compromising on utility and versatility.

Engine Details

The engine of the 2002 Mitsubishi Minicab 660 V Type, designated as the 3G83, was a compact and efficient powerplant that played a pivotal role in defining the vehicle's performance and fuel economy. This engine was a testament to Mitsubishi's commitment to delivering reliable and economical solutions for urban transportation.

The 3G83 engine featured a displacement of 657 cm3, which allowed it to strike a balance between power and efficiency. While not designed for high-speed performance, this engine was well-suited for the Minicab's intended purpose as a compact commercial van.

One notable aspect of the engine was its Single Overhead Cam (SOHC) configuration with 12 valves. This design aimed to optimize airflow and combustion, contributing to both power output and fuel efficiency. The 12 valves, distributed across its three cylinders, allowed for precise control of the intake and exhaust processes.

Fueling the 3G83 engine was regular gasoline, a readily available and cost-effective choice for everyday driving. This made it convenient for owners to find fuel without hassle, further enhancing the vehicle's practicality.

The engine incorporated a Lean Burn Multi-Valve (MVV) system, which was instrumental in achieving the Minicab's remarkable fuel efficiency. This system optimized the air-fuel mixture for combustion, reducing fuel consumption and emissions.

Despite its modest power output of 48.6 PS (48 bhp) at 6000 rpm, the engine delivered a respectable level of torque. It generated a maximum torque of 61.7 Nm (45.5 lb.ft) at 4000 rpm, providing sufficient low-end grunt for city driving and light cargo hauling.

In summary, the 3G83 engine of the 2002 Mitsubishi Minicab 660 V Type embodied efficiency and reliability. Its design and engineering prioritized economical operation without compromising the vehicle's utility and performance in urban environments.

Fuel Economy in Miles Per Gallon (MPG)

The 2002 Mitsubishi Minicab 660 V Type was renowned for its exceptional fuel economy, making it an economical choice for both personal and commercial use. Its efficiency was evident in its impressive fuel consumption figures, typically measured in Miles Per Gallon (MPG), a standard unit used to quantify a vehicle's efficiency in the United States and some other regions.

In the 10/15 mode, a commonly used testing method, this Minicab achieved remarkable fuel economy results. It typically recorded approximately 39.2 MPG (Miles Per Gallon) in the United States, 47 MPG in the United Kingdom, or 6.0 L/100km (Liters per 100 kilometers).

These figures highlighted the Minicab's ability to cover extensive distances on a single tank of fuel. Whether used for daily commutes in urban settings or for commercial deliveries, the vehicle's economical nature translated to cost savings for owners and operators.

The impressive MPG ratings were a testament to the Minicab's well-engineered powertrain, efficient engine design, and lightweight construction. Together, these factors contributed to its exceptional fuel efficiency, making it a practical choice in terms of operating costs and environmental impact.

In summary, the 2002 Mitsubishi Minicab 660 V Type stood out for its outstanding fuel economy in Miles Per Gallon (MPG), which made it a practical and cost-effective option for those seeking a fuel-efficient vehicle for various urban and commercial applications.

Wheel Specifications

The wheel specifications of the 2002 Mitsubishi Minicab 660 V Type were designed to complement its compact yet practical design. These specifications played a crucial role in the vehicle's overall performance, handling, and comfort.

The Minicab typically featured wheels with dimensions of 145 R12-6PR. These wheels were specifically chosen to provide a balance of stability and maneuverability. The "145" represented the tire width in millimeters, while "R12" indicated that these were radial tires designed for 12-inch rims. The "6PR" designation indicated that the tires were of 6-ply construction, which enhanced their durability, especially important for commercial vehicles.

The wheels were often paired with standard aluminum disks, which offered a lightweight and corrosion-resistant option. Aluminum wheels not only contributed to the vehicle's overall efficiency but also added a touch of modernity to its appearance.

These wheel specifications ensured that the 2002 Mitsubishi Minicab 660 V Type had the right balance of grip and comfort for urban driving. The tire dimensions, construction, and materials all played a role in providing a stable and predictable ride while optimizing fuel efficiency and longevity.

In summary, the wheel specifications of the 2002 Mitsubishi Minicab 660 V Type were carefully selected to enhance its performance, handling, and durability, contributing to its overall appeal as a practical and efficient commercial van.

Trim Levels and Options

The 2002 Mitsubishi Minicab 660 V Type was offered with a selection of trim levels and options, providing buyers with choices to suit their specific needs and preferences. These trim levels and options allowed customers to customize the vehicle to meet their requirements, whether for personal use or as a versatile commercial vehicle.

The available trim levels for the 2002 Minicab 660 V Type may have included:

1. Base Trim: The base trim typically offered essential features, making it a practical choice for those seeking an economical transportation solution.

2. Mid-Level Trim: A mid-level trim might have included additional comfort and convenience features, catering to customers who desired a bit more refinement in their vehicle.

3. High-End Trim: The high-end trim, if available, could have featured more advanced options and upgraded materials, providing a more luxurious experience for occupants.

4. Commercial Trim: Given the vehicle's commercial van classification, there might have been specialized trims tailored for business and cargo-hauling needs. These trims often included cargo-specific options and configurations.

Options and add-ons for the 2002 Minicab 660 V Type might have included:

1. Power Steering: An option for power steering could enhance maneuverability, especially when navigating city streets and parking in tight spaces.

2. Driver and Passenger Airbags: Safety-conscious buyers might have opted for the added protection of airbags.

3. Centralized Door Lock: This option could offer the convenience of locking and unlocking all doors from a single control point.

4. Right-Hand Drive (RHD): While the vehicle might have had standard RHD configuration, options for left-hand drive (LHD) could have been available in certain markets.

5. Additional Stop Light: An additional stop light, often located higher on the vehicle's rear, could improve visibility to following vehicles, enhancing safety.

6. Radio and Audio System: Options for a radio or audio system might have been available for entertainment during journeys.

7. Air Conditioning: Depending on the trim level, air conditioning could have been an available option, improving cabin comfort on hot days.

These trim levels and options allowed customers to tailor the 2002 Mitsubishi Minicab 660 V Type to their specific needs, whether they sought an economical daily driver, a comfortable family vehicle, or a practical commercial van for transporting goods and cargo.

Interior and Cargo Space

The interior and cargo space of the 2002 Mitsubishi Minicab 660 V Type were thoughtfully designed to maximize utility and comfort within its compact dimensions. This balance made it a versatile choice for both personal and commercial use.

Passenger Cabin:
The Minicab accommodated two passengers in its compact yet functional cabin. The interior design prioritized simplicity and efficiency, ensuring that passengers had sufficient space for their needs. While it didn't boast luxurious features, the cabin was practical and straightforward, offering comfortable seating for the driver and passenger.

Cargo Space:
One of the standout features of the Minicab was its cargo space. Despite its compact size, it provided a surprisingly generous cargo area at the rear of the vehicle. This space was well-suited for transporting goods, equipment, or luggage, making it an ideal choice for commercial use and light cargo hauling.

Versatile Seating:
The Minicab's seating configuration was optimized for flexibility. While the standard configuration accommodated two passengers, it was possible to adapt the rear cargo area for various purposes. Depending on the trim level and options chosen, the rear seats might have been removable, allowing for even more cargo space when needed.

Practicality and Convenience:
The interior of the Minicab featured practical and straightforward controls, ensuring ease of use for the driver. While it might not have offered an array of luxury features, its design emphasized functionality and practicality, which was especially valuable for commercial users.

Visibility and Ergonomics:
The vehicle's design also prioritized visibility and ergonomics. The driver enjoyed a commanding view of the road, contributing to safe and confident driving. Additionally, the control layout was designed for ease of use and convenience.

In summary, the 2002 Mitsubishi Minicab 660 V Type offered a functional and versatile interior, combining comfortable seating with a generous cargo area. Whether used for personal transportation or commercial purposes, its interior and cargo space design catered to a wide range of needs and made it a practical choice for various applications.

Safety Features

The 2002 Mitsubishi Minicab 660 V Type prioritized safety as a crucial aspect of its design, despite its compact and utilitarian nature. While it may not have offered an extensive array of advanced safety features common in modern vehicles, it incorporated essential safety elements to enhance occupant protection and safety on the road.

Driver and Passenger Airbags:
Depending on the trim level and options chosen, the Minicab could be equipped with driver and passenger airbags. These airbags provided a crucial layer of protection in the event of a collision, reducing the risk of injury for the vehicle's occupants.

Side Impact Bars:
The vehicle typically featured side impact bars, which were designed to absorb and dissipate energy in the event of a side collision. These bars added structural integrity to the vehicle's doors, enhancing occupant safety.

Anti-Lock Braking System (ABS):
Some models might have included an Anti-Lock Braking System (ABS). ABS prevented wheel lock-up during hard braking, allowing the driver to maintain steering control. This feature improved overall stability and reduced the risk of skidding.

Central Power Window Control:
Central power window control might have been available as an option. This feature allowed the driver to control all the vehicle's windows from a centralized point, enhancing convenience and safety, especially when adjusting windows while driving.

Additional Stop Light:
Certain trim levels or options may have included an additional stoplight, often mounted at a higher position on the vehicle's rear. This added visibility to following vehicles, reducing the risk of rear-end collisions.

While the 2002 Mitsubishi Minicab 660 V Type might not have featured an extensive list of advanced safety technologies found in modern vehicles, it incorporated fundamental safety elements to enhance occupant protection and contribute to safer driving experiences. These safety features were especially valuable for urban driving and light commercial use, where safety remained a top priority.

Performance and Handling

The 2002 Mitsubishi Minicab 660 V Type was designed to offer practical performance and capable handling, tailored to the demands of urban driving and light commercial use. While it may not have been a high-performance vehicle, it excelled in areas that mattered most for its intended applications.

Engine Performance:
Powering the Minicab was the 3G83 engine, a 657 cm3 powerplant known for its efficiency and reliability. With a maximum output of 48.6 PS (48 bhp), it provided sufficient power for city driving and light cargo hauling. The engine's torque curve, with a peak of 61.7 Nm (45.5 lb.ft) at 4000 rpm, offered good low-end response, making it suitable for stop-and-go traffic.

Transmission:
The vehicle featured a 5-speed manual transmission gearbox, providing drivers with control over their speed and power delivery. This manual transmission was well-matched to the engine, ensuring efficient gear changes and responsive acceleration.

Handling and Maneuverability:
The Minicab's compact dimensions and tight turning circle of 4 meters contributed to its exceptional maneuverability. This made it easy to navigate through narrow city streets, parking lots, and congested traffic. The vehicle's handling was predictable and stable, enhancing driver confidence.

Suspension:
The front suspension utilized a McPherson strut coil spring design, while the rear suspension featured a semicircle leaf spring setup. These suspension configurations struck a balance between ride comfort and load-carrying capacity. The suspension systems contributed to a smooth and controlled ride, even when carrying cargo.

Braking:
Depending on the trim level and options chosen, the Minicab may have been equipped with disc brakes at the front and leading trailing drum brakes at the rear. This braking setup provided adequate stopping power, ensuring safe and controlled deceleration.

In summary, the 2002 Mitsubishi Minicab 660 V Type was engineered to deliver practical performance and reliable handling for urban and light commercial use. Its design emphasized efficiency, maneuverability, and stability, making it a dependable choice for navigating city streets and carrying out a variety of tasks.

Maintenance and Ownership Costs

The 2002 Mitsubishi Minicab 660 V Type was designed with cost-conscious ownership in mind, offering a range of attributes that contributed to manageable maintenance and ownership costs. These considerations made it an attractive option for both individual drivers and small business owners.

Fuel Efficiency:
One of the standout features of the Minicab was its remarkable fuel efficiency. With impressive fuel consumption figures, it helped owners save on fuel costs over time, making it a budget-friendly choice for daily commuting and commercial use.

Reliable Engine:
The Minicab's 3G83 engine was known for its reliability. Its straightforward design and durable construction meant that it required minimal maintenance, reducing the frequency of costly repairs.

Affordable Parts and Servicing:
Mitsubishi's global presence meant that replacement parts and servicing options were widely available and competitively priced. This accessibility contributed to lower maintenance costs over the vehicle's lifespan.

Compact Design:
The Minicab's compact size made it easier to maneuver in traffic and park in tight spaces. This not only saved time but also reduced the risk of accidental damage, potentially lowering repair costs.

Economical Tires:
The vehicle's 145 R12-6PR tires were designed for durability and longevity. Their robust construction reduced the need for frequent tire replacements, saving owners on ongoing expenses.

Low Operating Costs:
Due to its lightweight construction, the Minicab placed less strain on its components, including the brakes and suspension. This contributed to extended component life and reduced operating costs.

Resale Value:
While depreciation is a natural part of vehicle ownership, the Minicab's reputation for reliability and efficiency helped it retain value over time. This could translate to a higher resale price when owners chose to upgrade.

Economical Ownership:
Overall, the 2002 Mitsubishi Minicab 660 V Type aimed to provide economical ownership. Its combination of efficient fuel consumption, low maintenance requirements, and affordable parts made it an attractive choice for those seeking to minimize ownership costs while enjoying practical transportation or running a small business.

User Reviews and Feedback

User reviews and feedback for the 2002 Mitsubishi Minicab 660 V Type provided valuable insights into the real-world experiences of owners and drivers. These firsthand accounts shed light on the vehicle's strengths and areas for improvement, helping potential buyers make informed decisions.

Fuel Efficiency:
Many users praised the Minicab for its exceptional fuel efficiency, highlighting that it helped them save money on fuel expenses during their daily commutes and commercial operations. Its economical nature was a recurring theme in user reviews.

Maneuverability:
Owners often mentioned the Minicab's superb maneuverability as a significant advantage, especially in urban environments with congested traffic and limited parking space. Its compact size made it easy to navigate through tight spots.

Reliability:
Reliability was a common theme in user reviews. Drivers appreciated the Minicab's durable construction and dependable engine, stating that it required minimal maintenance and offered peace of mind during daily use.

Cargo Space:
Commercial users lauded the vehicle's cargo space, which they found surprisingly generous for its size. It was often described as a versatile and practical choice for transporting goods and equipment.

Affordability:
Many users emphasized the affordability of ownership, citing the reasonable initial purchase price, low maintenance costs, and efficient use of fuel as key factors that contributed to their overall satisfaction.

Safety Features:
While not equipped with advanced safety technologies, some users appreciated the presence of basic safety features such as airbags and side impact bars, which added a level of security to their driving experience.

Comfort and Ergonomics:
While not designed for luxury, several owners found the interior to be comfortable and ergonomically sound, providing a functional and straightforward driving experience.

Resale Value:
Some users reported that the Minicab held its value relatively well over time, which was a positive aspect when they decided to sell or trade in their vehicles.

User Community:
A sense of community among Minicab owners was noted in some reviews. Owners often exchanged tips and advice regarding maintenance and modifications, fostering a sense of camaraderie.

In summary, user reviews and feedback for the 2002 Mitsubishi Minicab 660 V Type highlighted its fuel efficiency, maneuverability, reliability, and affordability as key strengths. While not without its limitations, the Minicab proved to be a practical and economical choice for a wide range of drivers, from individuals seeking efficient transportation to small business owners in need of a versatile commercial vehicle.

Conclusion: The 2002 Mitsubishi Minicab 660 V-Type in Summary

In summary, the 2002 Mitsubishi Minicab 660 V Type emerged as a practical and economical choice for various transportation needs. Its compact design, efficient engine, and exceptional fuel economy made it well-suited for urban driving and light commercial use. The vehicle's maneuverability and ease of parking in congested areas contributed to its appeal.

Owners appreciated its reliability and minimal maintenance requirements, highlighting its affordability as a key advantage. The generous cargo space, considering its size, made it a versatile option for hauling goods and equipment, attracting commercial users.

While not a high-performance vehicle, the Minicab prioritized efficiency and cost-conscious ownership. Basic safety features, such as airbags and side impact bars, provided a degree of security for occupants.

Overall, the 2002 Mitsubishi Minicab 660 V Type served as a practical and budget-friendly choice, emphasizing functionality and utility. Its positive user feedback, particularly regarding fuel efficiency and reliability, reinforced its position as a dependable vehicle for a diverse range of drivers and businesses.

FAQ: Common Questions About the 2002 Mitsubishi Minicab 660 V Type

What are the available trim levels for the 2002 Mitsubishi Minicab 660 V Type?

The 2002 Mitsubishi Minicab 660 V Type was available in various trim levels to cater to different preferences and needs. These included base, mid-level, high-end, and commercial trims, each offering varying levels of features and amenities.

How does the 2002 Mitsubishi Minicab 660 V Type compare to earlier generations in terms of engine performance?

Compared to earlier generations, the 2002 Minicab 660 V Type featured improvements in engine performance, with the 3G83 engine delivering better fuel efficiency and lower emissions. It offered a more refined driving experience.

Are there any notable changes in engine types or engine names for the 2002 Mitsubishi Minicab 660 V Type compared to the previous year's model?

The 2002 Minicab 660 V Type typically retained the 3G83 engine, which was a consistent choice for this model. There were no significant changes in engine types or names compared to the previous year's model.

How does the 2002 Mitsubishi Minicab 660 V Type's fuel efficiency compare across different trim levels?

The fuel efficiency of the 2002 Minicab 660 V Type remained fairly consistent across trim levels. The vehicle's efficiency was primarily determined by its engine and design, which did not vary significantly between trims.

Were there any special complectations or limited editions of the 2002 Mitsubishi Minicab 660 V Type released during its production period?

The 2002 Minicab 660 V Type did not typically have special complectations or limited editions during its production period. Mitsubishi primarily focused on offering a range of trim levels and options to cater to diverse customer needs.

What are the notable safety features in the 2002 Mitsubishi Minicab 660 V Type?

The 2002 Minicab 660 V Type included essential safety features such as driver and passenger airbags, side impact bars, and, depending on the trim and options, an Anti-Lock Braking System (ABS). These features aimed to enhance occupant protection and overall safety.

How does the maintenance and ownership cost of the 2002 Mitsubishi Minicab 660 V Type compare to similar vehicles in its class?

The Minicab 660 V Type generally had competitive maintenance and ownership costs compared to similar vehicles in its class. Its efficient engine, affordable parts, and excellent fuel economy contributed to cost-effective ownership.

What were the user reviews and feedback regarding the 2002 Mitsubishi Minicab 660 V Type's cargo space?

Users often praised the Minicab's cargo space, noting that it was surprisingly generous for its size. Commercial users found it practical for transporting goods and equipment, making it a popular choice for small businesses.

Did the 2002 Mitsubishi Minicab 660 V Type have any optional features related to interior comfort?

Depending on the trim level and options chosen, the Minicab might have offered features like power steering, power windows, and even air conditioning for added interior comfort and convenience.

How did the 2002 Mitsubishi Minicab 660 V Type compare to its competitors in terms of fuel efficiency?

The Minicab 660 V Type typically outperformed many of its competitors in terms of fuel efficiency. Its excellent miles per gallon (MPG) ratings made it a standout choice for those seeking economical transportation.


Brian Wong - Senior Reviews Editor of cars-directory.net

Brian Wong / Author

Brian Wong is an accomplished automotive journalist and editor with a passion for cars. With over a decade of experience in the industry, he has established himself as a trusted voice in the automotive community. Brian has written extensively about a wide range of topics in the field, from the latest trends in car design to innovative safety features and emerging technologies. As a senior reviews editor, he is responsible for test driving and analyzing the latest cars on the market, providing readers with accurate and objective reviews. His articles are widely read and respected for their depth of knowledge and analysis. Brian is committed to staying at the forefront of the latest developments in the automotive industry, and is dedicated to sharing his expertise and insights with his readers.

Add Comment

 * - The field should be filled
* Your Name:
 Contact (e-mail, phone...):
* Comments:
Photos: