1995 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 Q2 Specs


OVERVIEW

With a fuel consumption of 41.2 mpg US - 49.5 mpg UK - 5.7 L/100km, a weight of 1609 lbs (730 kg), the Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 Q2 has a water cooling 4 cylinder SOHC engine, a Regular gasoline engine 4A30. This engine 4A30 produces a maximum power of 55.7 PS (55 bhp - 41 kW) at 7000 rpm and a maximum torque of 59.8 Nm (44.1 lb.ft - 6.1 kg.m) at 5000 rpm. The engine power is transmitted to the road by the front wheel drive (FF) with a 3AT gearbox. For stopping power, the Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 Q2 braking system includes Leading trailing drum brake at the rear and Disk at the front. Stock tire sizes are 145/70 on 12 inch rims 69S at the rear and 145/70 on 12 inch rims 69S at the front. Chassis details - Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 Q2 has 3 link rear suspension and McPherson strut front suspension for road holding and ride confort.

Add to compare list

GENERAL INFORMATION
Complectation Name660 Q2
Period of ProductionNov 1995 - Sep 1998
Drive Wheels - Traction - DrivetrainFF
Body TypeMinivan (2 row seats)
Transmission Gearbox - Number of Speeds3AT
Engine Size - Displacement - Engine Capacity659 cm3 or 40.2 cu-in
Frame NameE-H31A
Price of New Car in Tokyo, Yen1049000

MITSUBISHI MINICA TOPPO 660 Q2 SIZE, DIMENSIONS AND WEIGHT
Exterior Length329.5 cm or 129.72 inches
Exterior Width139.5 cm or 54.92 inches
Exterior Height169.5 cm or 66.73 inches
Interior Length162.5 cm or 63.97 inches
Interior Width121 cm or 47.63 inches
Interior Height146 cm or 57.48 inches
Wheelbase228 cm or 89.76 inches
Front Axle Length121.5 cm or 47.83 inches
Rear Axle Length121.5 cm or 47.83 inches
Ride Height - Ground Clearance15.5 cm or 6.1 inches
Weight730 kg or 1609 lbs
Num. of Seats4
Num. of Doors4
Minimum Turning Circle - Turning Diameter, m4.2
Fuel Tank Capacity8.9 US gallons
7.4 UK gallons
34 L

MITSUBISHI MINICA TOPPO 660 Q2 ENGINE TECHNICAL DATA
Engine Code4A30
Maximum Power - Output - Horsepower55.7 PS or 55 bhp or 41 kW
Maximum Power RPM7000 rpm
Maximum Torque59.8 Nm or 44.1 lb.ft or 6.1 kg.m
Maximum Torque RPM5000 rpm
Engine Type - Number of Cylinderswater cooling 4 cylinder SOHC
Fuel TypeRegular gasoline
Fuel Consumption (10/15 mode)41.2 mpg US
49.5 mpg UK
5.7 L/100km
Fuel Consumption (60 km/h mode)56 mpg US
67.2 mpg UK
4.2 L/100km
1st Gear Ratio2.846
2nd Gear Ratio1.581
3rd Gear Ratio1
4th Fear Ratio0.685
Rear Gear Ratio2.176
Compression Ratio10
Bore6 cm or 2.36 inches
Stroke5.8 cm or 2.28 inches

MITSUBISHI MINICA TOPPO 660 Q2 SUSPENSION
Front Brakes - Disc DimensionsDisk
Rear Brakes - Disс DimensionsLeading trailing drum brake
Front SuspensionMcPherson strut
Rear Suspension3 link
Front Tyres - Rims Dimensions145/70 R12 69S
Rear Tyres - Rims Dimensions145/70 R12 69S
Tyres - Rims Dimensions145 / 70 R12 69S
Aluminium DiskStandart

MITSUBISHI MINICA TOPPO 660 Q2 EXTERIOR
SunroofOption
Tilt SunroofNo
Twin SunroofNo
Front SpoilerNo
Rear SpoilerNo
Power Adjustable Door MirrorsNo
Xenon LampsNo
Front Fog LampsNo
Rear Fog LampsNo
Cornering LampsNo
Ultraviolet Glass ProtectionOption
Roof RailNo
Back WiperStandart

MITSUBISHI MINICA TOPPO 660 Q2 INTERIOR
Power WindowNo
Power SteeringStandart
TachometerNo
Centralized Door LockNo
Keyless EnterNo
Right Hand DriveStandart
Left Hand DriveNo
Leather WindingNo
Adjustable SteeringNo
Telescopic SteeringNo
Tilt SteeringNo
Wood PanelNo
Cruise ControlNo
Leather SeatNo
Power Adjustable SeatsNo
Power Ajustable Front SeatNo
Power Ajustable Back SeatNo
Reclining SeatsNo
Removable SeatsNo
Turning SeatsNo

MITSUBISHI MINICA TOPPO 660 Q2 SAFETY
Drivers AirbagOption
Passengers AirbagNo
Side AirbagNo
Side Impact BarStandart
TCSNo
Break AssistNo
Parking RadarNo
Central Power Window ControlNo
Additional Stop LightNo
Safety Belt PretensionerNo
Safety Belt LimiterNo
3 Point Safety BeltStandart
Child Car RestraintsStandart
Durable FrameNo

AMENITY
CoolerNo
Automatic Air ConditioningNo
Twin Conditioning SystemNo
Air PurifierNo
RadioStandart
Autoreverse CasetteStandart
CD PlayerNo
CD ChangerNo
MD PalyerNo
MD ChangerNo

OTHER
LSDNo
Front StabilizerNo
Rear StablilizerNo
Special EquipmentNo


- Present
- Option
- Not Present (or Dealer Option)




By Brian Wong, Reviewed by: Kurt Niebuhr, Updated on April 20, 2024
πŸ“Œ Introduction to the 1995-1998 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 Q2
πŸ“Œ Engine Options and Performance
πŸ“Œ Dimensions and Sizes
πŸ“Œ Fuel Tank Capacity
πŸ“Œ Fuel Consumption
πŸ“Œ Fuel Average (MPG)
πŸ“Œ Wheel Options
πŸ“Œ Trim Levels and Variants
πŸ“Œ Interior Features and Space
πŸ“Œ Safety Features
πŸ“Œ Exterior Design and Styling
πŸ“Œ Reliability and Maintenance
πŸ“Œ Ownership Costs
πŸ“Œ Conclusion: The 1995-1998 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 Q2 in Review
πŸ“Œ Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) About the 1995-Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 Q2

Introduction to the 1995-1998 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 Q2

The 1995-1998 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 Q2 was a compact minivan that graced the automotive scene during a specific window in the late '90s. This diminutive vehicle was designed with a focus on efficient urban mobility and practicality, making it an ideal choice for city dwellers and those seeking a compact, easy-to-maneuver vehicle.

One of the notable features of the Minica Toppo 660 Q2 was its front-wheel-drive (FF) setup, ensuring good traction and stability on city streets. The vehicle's compact size and minivan body style with two rows of seats offered ample seating for up to four passengers, making it a convenient choice for small families or urban commuters.

Under the hood, this Mitsubishi model housed a 659cc engine with an engine code of 4A30. It produced a respectable 55.7 horsepower, delivering adequate power for city driving. The transmission featured a 3-speed automatic gearbox, providing smooth and efficient gear shifts.

In terms of size and dimensions, the Minica Toppo 660 Q2 boasted compact exterior measurements, including a length of 329.5 cm, a width of 139.5 cm, and a height of 169.5 cm. These dimensions allowed it to navigate narrow city streets and fit into tight parking spaces with ease. The wheelbase measured 228 cm, contributing to stability and handling.

Inside the cabin, the Minica Toppo 660 Q2 provided a practical and comfortable interior space. The vehicle had four seats, ensuring passenger comfort during city commutes. However, luxury features like power windows, power steering, and leather seats were notably absent in this model.

Fuel efficiency was a strong suit of the Minica Toppo 660 Q2, as it delivered impressive fuel consumption figures. It achieved approximately 41.2 mpg in the 10/15 mode and 56 mpg in the 60 km/h mode, making it an economical choice for daily city driving.

Overall, the 1995-1998 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 Q2 represented a compact and practical minivan option for urban drivers seeking efficiency and maneuverability in their daily commutes. Its compact dimensions, efficient engine, and good fuel economy were among its key selling points during its production years.

Engine Options and Performance

The 1995-1998 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 Q2 was equipped with a compact yet efficient engine that suited its urban-focused design. Under the hood of this minivan, you'd find a 659cc engine with the engine code 4A30. This water-cooled, 4-cylinder engine featured a single overhead cam (SOHC) configuration, emphasizing reliability and simplicity.

In terms of power output, the Minica Toppo 660 Q2 generated approximately 55.7 horsepower, delivering adequate performance for city driving scenarios. This power output, combined with its lightweight construction, allowed for agile navigation through crowded streets and efficient acceleration.

One of the notable aspects of this engine was its peak torque, which reached around 59.8 Nm. This torque value, achieved at 5000 rpm, provided the Minica Toppo with the necessary low-end power for urban stop-and-go traffic.

The engine's performance was further complemented by a 3-speed automatic transmission, which offered smooth gear shifts and ease of operation. While not designed for high-speed highway cruising, the Minica Toppo 660 Q2 excelled in its intended role as a city-friendly minivan.

Overall, the engine options and performance characteristics of the 1995-1998 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 Q2 were well-suited to urban environments. Its compact and efficient engine, coupled with a responsive automatic transmission, provided drivers with a practical and reliable means of transportation for their daily city commutes.

Dimensions and Sizes

The 1995-1998 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 Q2 exhibited compact dimensions that were well-suited for urban environments. Its design prioritized maneuverability and ease of navigation through crowded city streets, making it a practical choice for urban dwellers.

In terms of exterior dimensions, the Minica Toppo 660 Q2 featured a length of approximately 329.5 cm, a width of around 139.5 cm, and a height of roughly 169.5 cm. These compact measurements allowed the vehicle to effortlessly navigate tight spaces and park in crowded urban settings. The wheelbase measured 228 cm, contributing to its stability and handling characteristics.

Inside the cabin, the Minica Toppo 660 Q2 provided a functional and comfortable interior space. The interior dimensions included an interior length of approximately 162.5 cm, an interior width of around 121 cm, and an interior height of about 146 cm. These dimensions ensured a cozy and accommodating environment for passengers during city commutes.

The four-door configuration of this minivan allowed for convenient access to both the front and rear seats, making it a practical choice for small families or urban commuters. The vehicle's seating capacity accommodated up to four passengers comfortably.

Additionally, the Minica Toppo 660 Q2 featured a ground clearance of approximately 15.5 cm, striking a balance between urban comfort and road clearance. This clearance enabled it to navigate uneven city roads without compromising ride quality.

Overall, the 1995-1998 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 Q2's dimensions and sizes were tailored to the demands of city living. Its compact exterior, coupled with a functional interior layout, made it a versatile and maneuverable option for daily urban commutes and small-scale transportation needs.

Fuel Tank Capacity

The fuel tank capacity of the 1995-1998 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 Q2 was designed to align with its role as a compact city-focused minivan. This feature played a crucial role in determining the vehicle's range and refueling frequency, especially in urban environments where convenience matters.

The Minica Toppo 660 Q2 was equipped with a fuel tank that could hold approximately 8.9 US gallons, which is roughly equivalent to 7.4 UK gallons or 34 liters of fuel. This capacity struck a balance between providing a reasonable driving range for city use and keeping the vehicle lightweight and nimble.

With its compact engine and efficient fuel consumption, this fuel tank capacity allowed the Minica Toppo to cover a significant distance on a single tank of fuel. The vehicle's focus on fuel efficiency and economy made it an economical choice for urban commuters who valued fewer trips to the gas station.

Overall, the fuel tank capacity of the 1995-1998 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 Q2 was well-suited to its intended purpose as a city-friendly minivan. It provided a practical balance between driving range and efficiency, contributing to the vehicle's appeal for those navigating the demands of urban driving.

Fuel Consumption

The fuel consumption of the 1995-1998 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 Q2 was a notable feature, aligning with its role as an efficient urban minivan. This vehicle was designed to excel in city driving scenarios where fuel economy and mileage are of paramount importance.

The Minica Toppo 660 Q2 delivered impressive fuel efficiency figures, making it a cost-effective choice for daily city commutes. In the 10/15 mode, which represents typical urban driving conditions, this minivan achieved approximately 41.2 mpg in the US, 49.5 mpg in the UK, or 5.7 liters per 100 kilometers. These figures demonstrated its ability to cover a substantial distance on a modest amount of fuel, reducing the frequency of refueling stops.

Furthermore, in the 60 km/h mode, which simulates steady highway cruising speeds, the Minica Toppo 660 Q2 recorded fuel consumption figures of around 56 mpg in the US, 67.2 mpg in the UK, or 4.2 liters per 100 kilometers. This efficiency at higher speeds underlines its versatility for both city and highway driving, further enhancing its appeal as a practical urban vehicle.

The combination of a compact engine, lightweight construction, and efficient transmission contributed to these impressive fuel consumption figures. For drivers navigating the confines of urban traffic or those seeking to minimize their environmental footprint, the 1995-1998 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 Q2 offered a compelling balance between performance and economy, making it a noteworthy choice in its class.

Fuel Average (MPG)

The fuel average (miles per gallon, or MPG) of the 1995-1998 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 Q2 was a noteworthy aspect of its overall performance. This measure provided valuable information about the vehicle's fuel efficiency and its ability to maximize mileage for drivers, particularly in urban settings.

In typical urban driving conditions, where stop-and-go traffic is prevalent, the Minica Toppo 660 Q2 displayed an impressive fuel average of approximately 41.2 MPG in the US, 49.5 MPG in the UK, or 5.7 liters per 100 kilometers. These figures indicated that the vehicle excelled in city driving, offering significant mileage on a relatively small amount of fuel. This level of efficiency was particularly advantageous for daily commuters and those navigating congested city streets.

Even in scenarios where steady cruising at highway speeds was required, the Minica Toppo 660 Q2 maintained its impressive fuel efficiency. It achieved around 56 MPG in the US, 67.2 MPG in the UK, or 4.2 liters per 100 kilometers during the 60 km/h mode. This indicated its versatility as a vehicle suitable for both urban and highway use, ensuring cost-effective operation and reduced environmental impact.

The Minica Toppo 660 Q2's ability to deliver such high fuel averages stemmed from a combination of factors, including its compact engine, lightweight design, and efficient transmission. These attributes made it an appealing option for drivers seeking economical and environmentally-friendly transportation solutions in the late 1990s.

Wheel Options

The 1995-1998 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 Q2 featured wheel options that were in line with its compact and city-friendly design. These wheels were chosen to provide practicality, efficiency, and adequate handling for urban driving conditions.

The standard wheel size for the Minica Toppo 660 Q2 was 145/70 R12 69S, which referred to the tire dimensions. These wheels offered a balance between ride comfort and maneuverability, ensuring that the vehicle could navigate city streets with ease. The "R12" designation indicated that these were 12-inch wheels, aligning with the vehicle's compact size.

The 145/70 R12 69S tires were designed to provide good traction on urban roads while maintaining efficiency and cost-effectiveness. Their size contributed to the vehicle's responsive handling, allowing drivers to maneuver through tight spots and congested traffic with confidence.

Overall, the wheel options for the 1995-1998 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 Q2 were chosen to complement its role as a practical urban minivan. They provided the necessary balance between ride comfort and handling, enhancing the vehicle's suitability for city driving scenarios.

Trim Levels and Variants

The 1995-1998 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 Q2 offered a range of trim levels and variants to cater to various preferences and needs of customers. These trim levels provided a spectrum of features and options, allowing buyers to choose the one that best suited their requirements.

While specific trim levels and variants may vary by market and model year, here's an overview of some common options that were typically available for the Minica Toppo 660 Q2 during its production years:

1. Base Model: The base trim level usually offered essential features and amenities, making it an economical choice for those seeking a no-frills, practical vehicle for urban use.

2. Mid-Level Trim: A mid-level trim might have added features like air conditioning, power steering, and other convenience enhancements, providing a higher level of comfort and convenience.

3. High-End Trim: The high-end trim levels often included additional features such as power windows, central locking, and more advanced audio systems, delivering a more premium driving experience.

4. Special Editions: Manufacturers often introduced special edition models with unique styling or additional features to appeal to specific customer preferences or commemorate special occasions.

5. Safety Packages: Some variants may have focused on safety enhancements, offering features like airbags or enhanced braking systems for added peace of mind.

6. Customization Options: Mitsubishi may have offered customization options, allowing buyers to personalize their Minica Toppo 660 Q2 with various accessories and add-ons.

Trim levels and variants played a significant role in allowing customers to tailor the Minica Toppo 660 Q2 to their specific needs and budget. Whether prioritizing affordability, comfort, or additional features, buyers had choices that allowed them to find the right balance between price and features for their urban driving requirements.

Interior Features and Space

The interior features and space of the 1995-1998 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 Q2 were designed with practicality and efficiency in mind, aligning with its role as a compact urban minivan. While it prioritized functionality, it offered a comfortable and versatile cabin for occupants.

The Minica Toppo 660 Q2 could comfortably seat up to four passengers in its compact interior. The seating arrangement was straightforward, with front and rear seats providing sufficient space for passengers during daily city commutes. Although the vehicle was not equipped with luxurious features like power-adjustable seats or leather upholstery, it provided a functional and comfortable seating arrangement for its intended urban use.

The interior layout emphasized straightforward design, focusing on ease of use and practicality. Controls and switches were conveniently placed for the driver's accessibility, contributing to a user-friendly driving experience.

While the Minica Toppo 660 Q2's interior space was not expansive, it was well-utilized to maximize passenger comfort and cargo capacity. The vehicle's compact dimensions allowed it to maneuver through tight city streets, and the cabin offered adequate headroom and legroom for its passengers.

Storage options were also present to enhance practicality. These included storage compartments for personal items and essentials, contributing to an organized and clutter-free interior.

In terms of interior features, while it may not have boasted advanced technology or high-end entertainment systems, it typically offered standard amenities such as a functional radio and basic climate controls to ensure passenger comfort during city journeys.

Overall, the interior features and space of the 1995-1998 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 Q2 were tailored to meet the demands of urban living. While it may not have included luxury features, it provided a practical and comfortable interior environment for drivers and passengers, aligning with its role as a compact and efficient urban minivan.

Safety Features

The 1995-1998 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 Q2, designed primarily for urban driving, featured a set of safety features aimed at providing a secure and confident driving experience within city limits. While it may not have been equipped with an extensive array of advanced safety technologies, it incorporated essential safety elements to protect occupants and enhance road safety.

Key safety features commonly found in the Minica Toppo 660 Q2 during its production years included:

1. Driver's Airbag: Some variants of the Minica Toppo 660 Q2 offered a driver's airbag as an option. This airbag was designed to provide added protection in the event of a frontal collision, mitigating the risk of injury to the driver.

2. Side Impact Bar: The vehicle typically featured side impact bars, enhancing structural integrity and providing additional protection in the event of a side collision.

3. 3-Point Safety Belts: Standard 3-point safety belts were provided for all seating positions, ensuring that occupants were securely restrained in their seats during a collision.

4. Child Car Restraints: The Minica Toppo 660 Q2 often included provisions for securing child car restraints, addressing the safety needs of young passengers.

While these safety features addressed fundamental safety requirements, it's important to note that the Minica Toppo 660 Q2 did not incorporate advanced safety technologies that have become more commonplace in modern vehicles, such as electronic stability control, advanced driver-assistance systems, or multiple airbags.

The safety features of the Minica Toppo 660 Q2 were tailored to its era and intended use as an efficient urban minivan. They aimed to provide a reasonable level of occupant protection and road safety awareness, contributing to a secure driving experience within the confines of city streets.

Exterior Design and Styling

The exterior design and styling of the 1995-1998 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 Q2 reflected its purpose as a compact urban minivan. While prioritizing practicality and maneuverability, Mitsubishi incorporated distinct design elements that gave the vehicle a unique and recognizable appearance.

One of the defining features of the Minica Toppo 660 Q2 was its compact and boxy silhouette, which made it well-suited for city driving. The vehicle had a two-box design, with a short front end and a spacious cabin area. This design choice maximized interior space while maintaining a compact footprint, allowing it to navigate through crowded streets with ease.

The front fascia of the Minica Toppo featured a simple and straightforward design. It typically included a front grille with vertical slats and rectangular headlights. This design was clean and functional, emphasizing visibility and practicality for urban driving conditions.

In terms of exterior dimensions, the Minica Toppo 660 Q2 had a length of approximately 329.5 cm, a width of around 139.5 cm, and a height of roughly 169.5 cm. These compact measurements allowed it to fit into tight parking spaces and maneuver through congested traffic, making it a practical choice for city dwellers.

While the Minica Toppo 660 Q2's design focused on functionality, it also offered some customization options and variations in styling. Depending on the specific trim level or variant, buyers could find variations in exterior colors, wheel designs, and minor styling accents to suit their preferences.

Overall, the exterior design and styling of the 1995-1998 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 Q2 struck a balance between practicality and a distinctive appearance. Its compact and boxy design, combined with functional elements, made it a recognizable and efficient choice for navigating the challenges of urban environments.

Reliability and Maintenance

Reliability and maintenance considerations are crucial factors when evaluating the 1995-1998 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 Q2, especially for those seeking a dependable and cost-effective urban vehicle. While this minivan was known for its practicality and efficiency, its reliability and maintenance requirements played a significant role in its appeal.

1. Engine Durability: The Minica Toppo 660 Q2 was equipped with a compact and straightforward 659cc engine. Thanks to its simple design and construction, it often exhibited good durability when properly maintained. Regular oil changes, routine inspections, and adherence to recommended maintenance schedules were key to keeping the engine in good working order.

2. Maintenance Accessibility: Mitsubishi designed this vehicle with ease of maintenance in mind. Routine maintenance tasks, such as oil changes, air filter replacements, and brake inspections, were generally straightforward and could be performed without significant complexity or specialized tools.

3. Affordable Parts: The availability of affordable and readily accessible replacement parts contributed to the cost-effective ownership of the Minica Toppo 660 Q2. Routine maintenance and occasional repairs were generally affordable, making it an economical choice for budget-conscious drivers.

4. Reliable Transmission: The 3-speed automatic transmission, a common choice for this vehicle, was known for its reliability when properly maintained. Regular transmission fluid changes and inspections helped ensure its longevity.

5. Body and Frame Durability: The vehicle's frame and body were typically durable and resistant to common urban driving stresses. Proper care, such as rust prevention measures and regular washing, could help maintain its structural integrity over time.

6. Preventive Maintenance: As with any vehicle, preventive maintenance was key to ensuring long-term reliability. Regular checks of belts, hoses, brakes, and suspension components were essential to address potential issues before they became major problems.

In summary, the 1995-1998 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 Q2 offered a reliable and practical option for urban driving. Its durability, ease of maintenance, and affordability of replacement parts contributed to its reputation as a dependable choice for those seeking an efficient and cost-effective minivan for city commutes. Regular maintenance and attention to the manufacturer's recommendations were essential in maintaining its reliability over the years.

Ownership Costs

Owning the 1995-1998 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 Q2 came with a set of ownership costs that were typically in line with its role as a compact and budget-friendly urban minivan. Understanding these costs was essential for potential buyers looking to make an informed decision.

1. Fuel Economy: One of the standout aspects of the Minica Toppo 660 Q2 was its impressive fuel economy. It typically achieved high miles per gallon (MPG) figures in both urban and highway driving conditions. This translated to lower fuel expenses and reduced overall cost of ownership, especially for city commuters.

2. Insurance: Insurance costs for the Minica Toppo 660 Q2 were generally reasonable. The vehicle's compact size and safety features contributed to affordable insurance premiums, making it an attractive option for cost-conscious drivers.

3. Maintenance and Repairs: Routine maintenance costs for this minivan were typically affordable. Regular oil changes, brake inspections, and other scheduled maintenance tasks were cost-effective. Additionally, the availability of affordable replacement parts helped keep repair expenses in check.

4. Depreciation: Due to its age, the Minica Toppo 660 Q2 had already experienced significant depreciation by the late 1990s. While this meant that buyers could find used models at lower prices, it also implied that the vehicle's resale value was lower compared to newer vehicles.

5. Taxes and Fees: Vehicle registration fees and taxes varied by location and regulations. However, the Minica Toppo 660 Q2's compact size often translated to lower registration fees in many regions.

6. Financing: Financing costs, including interest rates and loan terms, depended on individual credit and financial institutions. However, the minivan's typically lower purchase price made financing more accessible to a wider range of buyers.

7. Overall Affordability: The Minica Toppo 660 Q2 was generally considered an affordable vehicle to own and operate. Its efficient fuel consumption, reasonable insurance costs, and accessible maintenance contributed to its reputation as a budget-friendly choice for urban drivers.

In summary, the ownership costs of the 1995-1998 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 Q2 were well-suited for budget-conscious individuals and families. Its efficiency, affordability in terms of maintenance and insurance, and lower fuel expenses made it an economical option for those seeking practical urban transportation.

Conclusion: The 1995-1998 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 Q2 in Review

The 1995-1998 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 Q2, as reviewed, presented itself as a purposeful and efficient choice for urban transportation during its production years. With its compact dimensions, practical design, and economical features, this minivan catered to the needs of city dwellers and budget-conscious drivers. Here is a recap of the key aspects that defined this vehicle:

Design and Practicality: The Minica Toppo 660 Q2 boasted a compact and boxy design, optimizing interior space while maintaining maneuverability in tight city streets. Its two-box layout prioritized passenger comfort and cargo capacity, making it a practical choice for urban commuting.

Efficient Engine and Fuel Economy: Powered by a modest 659cc engine, this minivan excelled in fuel efficiency. It achieved high miles per gallon figures in both city and highway driving scenarios, reducing the cost of fuel and the frequency of refueling stops.

Affordable Ownership: Ownership costs for the Minica Toppo 660 Q2 were generally budget-friendly. Its efficient fuel consumption, reasonable insurance premiums, and accessible maintenance contributed to its affordability.

Safety and Reliability: While not equipped with advanced safety technologies, the vehicle featured essential safety elements such as airbags and side impact bars. Its simple and durable design, when properly maintained, contributed to reliability and longevity.

Customization and Trim Levels: Mitsubishi offered various trim levels and customization options, allowing buyers to tailor the minivan to their preferences and budget. This flexibility ensured that there was a Minica Toppo 660 Q2 to suit a range of needs.

In conclusion, the 1995-1998 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 Q2 was a practical and efficient urban minivan designed to excel in city driving conditions. Its compact size, economical engine, and budget-friendly ownership costs made it a suitable choice for those seeking reliable and cost-effective transportation within the confines of city life.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) About the 1995-1998 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 Q2

What are the key features that distinguish the 1995-1998 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 Q2 from other models in its generation?

The 1995-1998 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 Q2 in this generation stood out for its compact dimensions, efficient 659cc engine, and practical two-box design. It offered cost-effective urban transportation with a focus on fuel efficiency and maneuverability.

Were there any significant changes or updates made to the Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 Q2 during these years?

Throughout the 1995-1998 production years, the Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 Q2 generally maintained its core design and features. There were no major model year-specific updates or changes, as it primarily remained a dependable urban minivan.

What engine options were available for the 1995-1998 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 Q2?

The Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 Q2 was typically equipped with a 659cc engine with the engine code 4A30. This compact engine was designed for efficiency and offered practical performance for urban driving.

Were there any sportier or performance-oriented variants of the Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 Q2 during these years?

The Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 Q2 was primarily designed as a practical urban minivan, and there were no sportier or high-performance variants available during this generation.

What trim levels were offered for the 1995-1998 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 Q2, and how did they differ from each other?

The available trim levels for the Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 Q2 varied by market and model year. Generally, there were base, mid-level, and high-end trim options. The differences typically included features like air conditioning, power steering, power windows, and audio systems, with higher trims offering more amenities.

What safety features were included in the Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 Q2 for these years?

The Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 Q2 typically included safety features such as a driver's airbag, side impact bars, 3-point safety belts, and provisions for child car restraints. While not equipped with advanced safety technologies, these elements provided essential occupant protection.

How did the fuel economy of the 1995-1998 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 Q2 compare to other vehicles in its class?

The Minica Toppo 660 Q2 excelled in fuel economy, particularly for urban driving. Its high miles per gallon (MPG) figures for both city and highway driving made it a competitive choice in its class, offering cost-effective operation and reduced environmental impact.

Can I expect the 1995-1998 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 Q2 to be reliable for daily city commuting?

Yes, the Minica Toppo 660 Q2 was designed for practical urban transportation. Its simple and durable construction, combined with regular maintenance, often resulted in reliable performance for daily city commuting.

What is the average price range for a used 1995-1998 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 Q2 in today's market?

The price of a used Minica Toppo 660 Q2 can vary widely depending on factors like condition, mileage, and location. However, as these models have aged, they are often available at affordable prices, making them an accessible choice for budget-conscious buyers.


Brian Wong - Senior Reviews Editor of cars-directory.net

Brian Wong / Author

Brian Wong is an accomplished automotive journalist and editor with a passion for cars. With over a decade of experience in the industry, he has established himself as a trusted voice in the automotive community. Brian has written extensively about a wide range of topics in the field, from the latest trends in car design to innovative safety features and emerging technologies. As a senior reviews editor, he is responsible for test driving and analyzing the latest cars on the market, providing readers with accurate and objective reviews. His articles are widely read and respected for their depth of knowledge and analysis. Brian is committed to staying at the forefront of the latest developments in the automotive industry, and is dedicated to sharing his expertise and insights with his readers.

Add Comment

 * - The field should be filled
* Your Name:
 Contact (e-mail, phone...):
* Comments:
Photos: