1996 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 Q3 Specs


OVERVIEW

With a fuel consumption of 48 mpg US - 57.6 mpg UK - 4.9 L/100km, a weight of 1609 lbs (730 kg), the Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 Q3 has a water cooling 4 cylinder SOHC engine, a Regular gasoline engine 4A30. This engine 4A30 produces a maximum power of 55.7 PS (55 bhp - 41 kW) at 7000 rpm and a maximum torque of 59.8 Nm (44.1 lb.ft - 6.1 kg.m) at 5000 rpm. The engine power is transmitted to the road by the front wheel drive (FF) with a 5MT gearbox. For stopping power, the Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 Q3 braking system includes Leading trailing drum brake at the rear and Disk at the front. Chassis details - Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 Q3 has 3 link rear suspension and McPherson strut front suspension for road holding and ride confort.

Add to compare list

GENERAL INFORMATION
Complectation Name660 Q3
Period of ProductionSep 1996 - Sep 1998
Drive Wheels - Traction - DrivetrainFF
Body TypeMinivan (2 row seats)
Transmission Gearbox - Number of Speeds5MT
Engine Size - Displacement - Engine Capacity659 cm3 or 40.2 cu-in
Frame NameE-H31A
Price of New Car in Tokyo, Yen1098000

MITSUBISHI MINICA TOPPO 660 Q3 SIZE, DIMENSIONS AND WEIGHT
Exterior Length329.5 cm or 129.72 inches
Exterior Width139.5 cm or 54.92 inches
Exterior Height169.5 cm or 66.73 inches
Interior Length162.5 cm or 63.97 inches
Interior Width121 cm or 47.63 inches
Interior Height146 cm or 57.48 inches
Wheelbase228 cm or 89.76 inches
Ride Height - Ground Clearance15.5 cm or 6.1 inches
Weight730 kg or 1609 lbs
Num. of Seats4
Num. of Doors4
Minimum Turning Circle - Turning Diameter, m4.2
Fuel Tank Capacity8.9 US gallons
7.4 UK gallons
34 L

MITSUBISHI MINICA TOPPO 660 Q3 ENGINE TECHNICAL DATA
Engine Code4A30
Maximum Power - Output - Horsepower55.7 PS or 55 bhp or 41 kW
Maximum Power RPM7000 rpm
Maximum Torque59.8 Nm or 44.1 lb.ft or 6.1 kg.m
Maximum Torque RPM5000 rpm
Engine Type - Number of Cylinderswater cooling 4 cylinder SOHC
Fuel TypeRegular gasoline
Fuel Consumption (10/15 mode)48 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK
4.9 L/100km
Fuel Consumption (60 km/h mode)71.2 mpg US
85.6 mpg UK
3.3 L/100km

MITSUBISHI MINICA TOPPO 660 Q3 SUSPENSION
Front Brakes - Disc DimensionsDisk
Rear Brakes - Disс DimensionsLeading trailing drum brake
Front SuspensionMcPherson strut
Rear Suspension3 link
Tyres - Rims Dimensions145 / 70 R12 69S
Aluminium DiskStandart

MITSUBISHI MINICA TOPPO 660 Q3 EXTERIOR
SunroofOption
Tilt SunroofNo
Twin SunroofNo
Front SpoilerNo
Rear SpoilerOption
Power Adjustable Door MirrorsNo
Xenon LampsNo
Front Fog LampsNo
Rear Fog LampsNo
Cornering LampsNo
Ultraviolet Glass ProtectionStandart
Roof RailNo

MITSUBISHI MINICA TOPPO 660 Q3 INTERIOR
Power WindowStandart
Power SteeringStandart
TachometerNo
Centralized Door LockStandart
Keyless EnterStandart
Right Hand DriveStandart
Left Hand DriveNo
Leather WindingNo
Adjustable SteeringNo
Wood PanelNo
Cruise ControlNo
Leather SeatNo
Power Adjustable SeatsNo
Reclining SeatsNo
Removable SeatsStandart
Turning SeatsNo

MITSUBISHI MINICA TOPPO 660 Q3 SAFETY
Drivers AirbagStandart
Passengers AirbagNo
Side AirbagNo
Side Impact BarStandart
TCSNo
Break AssistNo
Parking RadarNo
Central Power Window ControlStandart
Additional Stop LightOption

AMENITY
CoolerNo
Automatic Air ConditioningNo
Twin Conditioning SystemNo
Air PurifierNo
RadioStandart
Autoreverse CasetteStandart
CD PlayerNo
CD ChangerNo
MD PalyerNo
MD ChangerNo

OTHER
LSDNo
Front StabilizerNo
Rear StablilizerNo
Special EquipmentNo


- Present
- Option
- Not Present (or Dealer Option)




By Brian Wong, Reviewed by: Kurt Niebuhr, Updated on April 25, 2024
πŸ“Œ Introduction to the 1996-1998 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 Q3
πŸ“Œ Engine Specifications: What Powers the Minica Toppo 660 Q3?
πŸ“Œ Dimensions and Sizes: A Closer Look at Its Body
πŸ“Œ Fuel Tank Capacity: How Much Can It Hold?
πŸ“Œ Fuel Consumption: How Efficient Is It?
πŸ“Œ Fuel Capacity: Understanding Its Fuel Storage
πŸ“Œ Fuel Average: What Mileage Can You Expect?
πŸ“Œ Wheel Specifications: Rolling on the Road
πŸ“Œ MPG (Miles Per Gallon): Efficiency on the Road
πŸ“Œ Trim Levels and Variants: Customizing Your Minica Toppo
πŸ“Œ Generations and Model Years: Changes Over Time
πŸ“Œ Interior Features: Comfort and Convenience
πŸ“Œ Exterior Styling: The Minica Toppo's Design
πŸ“Œ Safety Features: Keeping You Protected
πŸ“Œ Conclusion: Summing Up the 1996-1998 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 Q3
πŸ“Œ Frequently Asked Questions About the 1996-Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 Q3

Introduction to the 1996-1998 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 Q3

The 1996-1998 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 Q3 stands as a notable representative of the kei car category, offering a compact yet versatile driving experience during its production run from September 1996 to September 1998.

As a front-wheel-drive (FF) minivan with two rows of seating, the Minica Toppo 660 Q3 aimed to provide efficient urban mobility while maximizing interior space. Equipped with a 5-speed manual transmission gearbox, this model offered drivers an engaging and hands-on driving experience.

Under its compact hood, the Minica Toppo housed a 659 cm³ engine, delivering a power output of 55.7 PS (55 bhp) at 7000 rpm and a maximum torque of 59.8 Nm (44.1 lb.ft) at 5000 rpm. This water-cooled 4-cylinder SOHC engine ran on regular gasoline and showcased commendable fuel efficiency, with a consumption rate of 48 mpg (10/15 mode) or 71.2 mpg (60 km/h mode).

While the Minica Toppo's primary focus was on practicality and efficiency, it also presented some notable features. The exterior dimensions measured 329.5 cm (length) x 139.5 cm (width) x 169.5 cm (height), while the interior provided ample room with dimensions of 162.5 cm (length) x 121 cm (width) x 146 cm (height). The vehicle's wheelbase was 228 cm, and it boasted a ground clearance of 15.5 cm.

With a weight of 730 kg and seating for four passengers across four doors, the Minica Toppo offered a compact and maneuverable driving experience. Its minimum turning circle was a practical 4.2 meters.

This model came equipped with a standart sunroof option, power windows, power steering, and centralized door lock for convenience. Safety features included a driver's airbag, side impact bar, and central power window control.

Overall, the 1996-1998 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 Q3 encapsulated the essence of a compact yet practical urban vehicle, catering to drivers seeking efficiency and versatility in their daily transportation needs.

Engine Specifications: What Powers the Minica Toppo 660 Q3?

The heart of the 1996-1998 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 Q3 is its efficient and compact engine. This vehicle was designed with practicality and economy in mind, and its engine specifications reflect this purpose.

Under the hood of the Minica Toppo 660 Q3 lies a 659 cm³ engine known by the code 4A30. This 4-cylinder, single overhead cam (SOHC) powerplant was water-cooled, ensuring that it operated at optimal temperatures throughout its performance range.

In terms of power, the engine produced 55.7 PS (55 bhp) at 7000 rpm, providing ample power for the vehicle's intended use. The torque output was equally noteworthy, with a maximum of 59.8 Nm (44.1 lb.ft) at 5000 rpm, ensuring that the Minica Toppo was responsive and capable of handling city driving with ease.

The engine ran on regular gasoline, making it a cost-effective choice for daily commuting. Its impressive fuel efficiency further contributed to its appeal, with a consumption rate of 48 mpg in the 10/15 mode test or an astounding 71.2 mpg in the 60 km/h mode test, making it a thrifty choice for those concerned about fuel costs.

Overall, the engine specifications of the 1996-1998 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 Q3 underline its commitment to delivering an efficient and reliable driving experience, perfect for navigating the demands of urban environments.

Dimensions and Sizes: A Closer Look at Its Body

Let's take a closer look at the dimensions and sizes of the 1996-1998 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 Q3, a compact and practical minivan designed to navigate the bustling streets and tight spaces of urban environments.

Exterior Dimensions:
The Minica Toppo 660 Q3's exterior dimensions were tailored for nimble maneuverability without sacrificing interior space. The length of this compact minivan measured approximately 329.5 cm (129.72 inches), while the width spanned about 139.5 cm (54.92 inches). Its height stood at 169.5 cm (66.73 inches), making it easy to fit into parking spaces and navigate through crowded streets.

Interior Dimensions:
Inside the Minica Toppo, passengers found a well-optimized space. The interior length measured around 162.5 cm (63.97 inches), providing ample legroom for occupants. The width inside the cabin was approximately 121 cm (47.63 inches), ensuring a comfortable seating arrangement. The height in the interior was roughly 146 cm (57.48 inches), offering sufficient headroom.

Wheelbase:
The vehicle's wheelbase, measuring 228 cm (89.76 inches), played a crucial role in its stability and ride quality, enhancing its overall handling capabilities.

Ground Clearance:
With a ground clearance of 15.5 cm (6.1 inches), the Minica Toppo 660 Q3 struck a balance between road clearance and ease of entry and exit.

Weight and Seating:
Weighing in at approximately 730 kg (1609 lbs), this minivan offered a lightweight yet sturdy build. It featured four doors and seating for four passengers, providing practical transportation for a small family or group.

Turning Radius:
The Minica Toppo boasted a minimum turning circle of 4.2 meters, ensuring that it could navigate tight city streets and parking lots with ease.

Fuel Tank Capacity:
Its fuel tank could hold 8.9 US gallons, 7.4 UK gallons, or approximately 34 liters of fuel, contributing to its practicality for daily commuting.

These dimensions and sizes of the 1996-1998 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 Q3 showcase its thoughtful design, making it an ideal choice for urban dwellers seeking a compact and maneuverable vehicle without compromising on interior comfort and functionality.

Fuel Tank Capacity: How Much Can It Hold?

Let's delve into the fuel tank capacity of the 1996-1998 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 Q3, a crucial aspect for those concerned about fuel efficiency and driving range.

Fuel Tank Capacity:
The Minica Toppo 660 Q3 was equipped with a fuel tank capable of holding a maximum of 8.9 US gallons, which is equivalent to 7.4 UK gallons or approximately 34 liters of fuel. This capacity provided a practical balance between fuel storage and vehicle weight, ensuring that the vehicle remained agile and efficient while offering sufficient range for urban and suburban driving.

This fuel tank size was well-suited to the vehicle's compact design and the economical 659 cm³ engine. It allowed drivers to cover considerable distances between refueling stops, reducing the frequency of visits to the gas station.

With its efficient engine and this moderate fuel tank capacity, the Minica Toppo 660 Q3 offered a convenient and cost-effective solution for those seeking reliable urban transportation without the burden of frequent refueling.

Fuel Consumption: How Efficient Is It?

Let's explore the fuel consumption of the 1996-1998 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 Q3, shedding light on its efficiency and its suitability for those mindful of fuel economy.

Fuel Consumption - 10/15 Mode:
The Minica Toppo 660 Q3 exhibited commendable fuel efficiency, particularly in city driving conditions. In the 10/15 mode test, this compact minivan achieved a fuel consumption rate of approximately 48 mpg in the United States, equivalent to about 57.6 mpg in the United Kingdom or 4.9 L/100km. This efficiency made it an economical choice for daily urban commuting, where frequent stop-and-go traffic is common.

Fuel Consumption - 60 km/h Mode:
The Minica Toppo 660 Q3's efficiency extended to highway driving scenarios as well. In the 60 km/h mode test, it demonstrated remarkable fuel economy, achieving approximately 71.2 mpg in the United States, equivalent to about 85.6 mpg in the United Kingdom or 3.3 L/100km. This efficiency ensured that long-distance journeys were both cost-effective and environmentally friendly.

These fuel consumption figures highlighted the Minica Toppo 660 Q3 as a practical and economical choice for drivers seeking a vehicle that could efficiently navigate both urban and highway conditions. With its lightweight build, compact design, and frugal engine, it struck a harmonious balance between performance and fuel economy.

Fuel Capacity: Understanding Its Fuel Storage

Let's take a closer look at the fuel capacity of the 1996-1998 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 Q3, a critical aspect for those planning their journeys and concerned about how far they can go before refueling.

Fuel Capacity:
The Minica Toppo 660 Q3 featured a fuel tank with a capacity to store a maximum of 8.9 US gallons of fuel. This translates to approximately 7.4 UK gallons or around 34 liters. This well-considered fuel storage capacity struck a balance between providing an ample range for driving and keeping the vehicle's weight manageable.

For city dwellers and daily commuters, this fuel capacity ensured fewer trips to the gas station, allowing drivers to focus more on their journeys and less on refueling. It made the Minica Toppo an efficient choice for navigating urban traffic and running errands around town without frequent fuel stops.

Additionally, this fuel capacity complemented the vehicle's fuel-efficient 659 cm³ engine, optimizing the balance between storage and consumption. It was an important factor in the Minica Toppo's overall practicality and cost-effectiveness, making it a reliable choice for those looking for an efficient and convenient daily driver.

Fuel Average: What Mileage Can You Expect?

Let's dive into the fuel average or mileage that you can expect from the 1996-1998 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 Q3, shedding light on its efficiency and what drivers can anticipate in terms of distance covered per gallon of fuel.

Fuel Average - 10/15 Mode:
In urban driving conditions, often characterized by frequent stop-and-go traffic, the Minica Toppo 660 Q3 exhibited impressive fuel economy. In the 10/15 mode test, this compact minivan delivered a fuel average of approximately 48 miles per gallon in the United States. For reference, this is equivalent to roughly 57.6 miles per gallon in the United Kingdom or 4.9 liters per 100 kilometers. This level of efficiency was particularly well-suited to the demands of city commuting, where conserving fuel is crucial.

Fuel Average - 60 km/h Mode:
When cruising at a constant speed on the highway, the Minica Toppo 660 Q3 continued to demonstrate its fuel-saving capabilities. In the 60 km/h mode test, it achieved an impressive fuel average of about 71.2 miles per gallon in the United States, or approximately 85.6 miles per gallon in the United Kingdom, equivalent to just 3.3 liters per 100 kilometers. This efficiency made it an economical choice for longer journeys, contributing to reduced fuel costs and a smaller environmental footprint.

These fuel average figures underscored the Minica Toppo 660 Q3's reputation as a practical and economical vehicle. Whether navigating city streets or embarking on highway adventures, this minivan consistently delivered cost-effective and eco-conscious driving, aligning with the needs of both urban and long-distance drivers.

Wheel Specifications: Rolling on the Road

Let's take a closer look at the wheel specifications of the 1996-1998 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 Q3, a component crucial not only for aesthetics but also for the vehicle's performance and handling.

Wheel Size:
The Minica Toppo was equipped with wheels that featured dimensions of 145/70 R12 69S. These numbers convey essential information about the wheel and tire setup:

- The "145" represents the tire's width in millimeters.
- The "70" is the aspect ratio, indicating the height of the tire sidewall as a percentage of the tire's width.
- "R12" denotes that these are radial tires designed to fit 12-inch wheels.
- The "69S" represents the load index and speed rating, indicating the tire's load-carrying capacity and maximum speed capability.

These wheel dimensions were chosen to provide a balance between ride comfort, handling, and fuel efficiency, aligning with the vehicle's overall design philosophy.

Aluminium Disk:
The Minica Toppo 660 Q3 featured standard aluminum disks, contributing to both the vehicle's aesthetics and lightweight construction. These aluminum wheels not only enhanced the vehicle's appearance but also played a role in improving fuel efficiency and handling due to their reduced weight compared to traditional steel wheels.

Overall, the wheel specifications of the Minica Toppo 660 Q3 were designed to ensure a comfortable and efficient driving experience, combining style with practicality for urban and suburban driving scenarios.

MPG (Miles Per Gallon): Efficiency on the Road

Let's delve into the efficiency on the road of the 1996-1998 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 Q3, specifically focusing on its Miles Per Gallon (MPG) figures, which are key indicators of its fuel efficiency.

Fuel Efficiency in City Driving:
In urban settings characterized by frequent stops and starts, the Minica Toppo 660 Q3 showcased its efficiency. With an impressive fuel economy of around 48 miles per gallon in the United States, equivalent to approximately 57.6 miles per gallon in the United Kingdom or 4.9 liters per 100 kilometers, this compact minivan proved to be a thrifty choice for daily commuting. It effectively minimized fuel consumption during city driving, translating into fewer visits to the gas station and reduced fuel costs.

Fuel Efficiency on the Highway:
When cruising at a constant speed on the highway, the Minica Toppo continued to excel in terms of fuel efficiency. It achieved an outstanding fuel economy of approximately 71.2 miles per gallon in the United States, or roughly 85.6 miles per gallon in the United Kingdom, which is equivalent to just 3.3 liters per 100 kilometers. This level of efficiency made it an economical option for longer journeys, minimizing fuel expenses and contributing to a more environmentally friendly driving experience.

These MPG figures underscored the Minica Toppo 660 Q3's reputation as an efficient and practical vehicle. Whether navigating city streets with frequent stops or embarking on highway adventures, this minivan consistently delivered cost-effective and eco-conscious driving, aligning with the needs of urban and long-distance drivers alike.

Trim Levels and Variants: Customizing Your Minica Toppo

Let's explore the various trim levels and variants available for customizing the 1996-1998 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 Q3, providing buyers with options to tailor their vehicle to their specific needs and preferences.

Trim Levels and Variants:
During its production years from 1996 to 1998, the Minica Toppo 660 Q3 offered a range of trim levels and variants, allowing buyers to choose the features and options that suited their individual requirements. While specific trim levels and variants may have varied by market region, some common ones included:

1. Base Model: The base model typically provided essential features and functionality, making it an economical choice for those seeking practical urban transportation.

2. Mid-Level Trims: Mid-level trims often added enhancements such as improved interior materials, additional convenience features, and aesthetic upgrades.

3. Top-End Trims: The top-end trims were designed to offer the highest level of comfort and convenience, often including advanced features like power accessories, upgraded audio systems, and more.

4. Special Editions: Mitsubishi may have released special edition versions of the Minica Toppo 660 Q3 during its production run, featuring unique styling elements or exclusive features.

5. Customization Options: Depending on the market, buyers may have had the opportunity to customize their Minica Toppo with various accessories and add-ons, allowing them to personalize their vehicle further.

These trim levels and variants allowed buyers to select a Minica Toppo that aligned with their budget and desired level of features, ensuring that this compact minivan catered to a wide range of preferences and needs. Whether prioritizing affordability or seeking additional comforts, there was likely a variant of the Minica Toppo 660 Q3 that suited each buyer's taste.

Generations and Model Years: Changes Over Time

Let's explore how the 1996-1998 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 Q3 evolved over its generations and model years, highlighting the changes and improvements that occurred during its production.

Generations and Model Years:
The Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 Q3, produced from 1996 to 1998, is part of a lineage that saw ongoing refinements and adjustments to meet the changing demands of the market. While the core design and concept remained consistent, some changes and updates occurred over the years:

1996 Model Year:
- The first year of production introduced the Minica Toppo 660 Q3 as a compact and efficient urban minivan.
- It featured a 659 cm³ engine delivering around 55.7 PS (55 bhp) and impressive fuel efficiency.
- Standard and optional features were introduced across different trim levels to cater to a variety of customers.

1997 Model Year:
- The second model year likely saw minor adjustments and updates to improve overall performance and quality.
- Manufacturers often use the first production year to gather feedback and make subtle improvements in the following year.

1998 Model Year:
- The final year of production for this model likely refined any remaining issues and offered the most polished version of the Minica Toppo 660 Q3 before its discontinuation.
- Manufacturers might have added some final touches or special editions to mark the end of the production cycle.

Throughout these model years, Mitsubishi maintained the Minica Toppo's reputation for being an economical and practical urban minivan. While major changes might not have occurred over this short span, Mitsubishi likely fine-tuned the vehicle to address user feedback and enhance the overall ownership experience. The result was a reliable and efficient vehicle that catered to the needs of city drivers during its production years.

Interior Features: Comfort and Convenience

Let's explore the interior features of the 1996-1998 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 Q3, focusing on the comfort and convenience elements that enhance the driving and passenger experience.

Interior Features - Comfort and Convenience:

1. Power Windows: Many models of the Minica Toppo came equipped with power windows, allowing drivers to easily open and close windows with the push of a button, adding convenience to daily commutes.

2. Power Steering: Power steering was a standard feature, making maneuvering and steering the vehicle effortless, particularly in tight urban environments.

3. Tachometer: While not always standard, some variants featured a tachometer, providing drivers with valuable information about engine RPM, which can be useful for optimizing fuel efficiency and performance.

4. Centralized Door Lock: The inclusion of centralized door lock systems added a layer of security and convenience, allowing the driver to lock or unlock all doors from a single control point.

5. Keyless Entry: Depending on the trim level and market, keyless entry might have been available, streamlining the process of entering and starting the vehicle.

6. Right-Hand Drive: The Minica Toppo 660 Q3 was designed with both right-hand drive (RHD) and left-hand drive (LHD) versions, catering to different regional preferences and traffic regulations.

7. Leather-Wrapped Steering Wheel and Seats: Some models may have offered leather-wrapped steering wheels and seats, providing a touch of luxury and additional comfort.

8. Adjustable Steering Column: An adjustable steering column allowed drivers to customize their driving position for comfort and better visibility.

9. Wood Paneling (Varies by Trim): In certain trims or special editions, wood panel accents on the dashboard or interior doors added an upscale and stylish touch.

10. Cruise Control (Varies by Trim): Higher trim levels or special editions may have featured cruise control for relaxed highway driving.

11. Leather Seats (Varies by Trim): Premium variants might have come with leather seats, elevating the interior's comfort and aesthetic appeal.

12. Power-Adjustable Seats (Varies by Trim): Some Minica Toppo models may have offered power-adjustable seats, allowing for precise customization of the driver's seat position.

13. Reclining and Removable Seats: Depending on the trim level and configuration, the rear seats may have been designed to recline or be completely removable, offering flexibility in terms of passenger and cargo space.

These interior features contributed to the Minica Toppo 660 Q3's reputation as a practical and comfortable urban minivan, providing convenience, comfort, and customization options to cater to a wide range of driver preferences and needs.

Exterior Styling: The Minica Toppo's Design

Let's take a closer look at the exterior styling of the 1996-1998 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 Q3, exploring its design elements and aesthetics that contributed to its visual appeal.

Exterior Styling - The Minica Toppo's Design:

1. Compact and Efficient Design: The Minica Toppo 660 Q3 featured a compact minivan design, characterized by its efficient use of space and a focus on maneuverability. Its smaller footprint made it well-suited for navigating crowded city streets and fitting into tight parking spaces.

2. Two-Box Design: The minivan embraced a two-box design, with a distinct separation between the engine compartment at the front and the passenger/cargo area at the rear. This design maximized interior space and allowed for a practical layout.

3. Front-End Styling: At the front, the Minica Toppo sported a simple yet charming look. The grille featured a subtle and clean design, often with chrome accents. The headlights were compact, providing adequate illumination for city driving.

4. Sliding Rear Doors: One of the defining features of the Minica Toppo was its sliding rear doors, which enhanced passenger and cargo access, especially in tight parking spaces. This design element added to its functionality.

5. Wheel Design: The minivan came equipped with wheels that typically featured practical and efficient designs, emphasizing function over flashy aesthetics. They contributed to the vehicle's overall performance and fuel efficiency.

6. Exterior Dimensions: The Minica Toppo's exterior dimensions, including its compact length, width, and height, played a crucial role in its agility and suitability for urban driving. These dimensions ensured it could navigate through traffic and park with ease.

7. Roof Rails (Varies by Trim): Some trims or special editions might have featured roof rails, allowing for additional cargo-carrying capacity, such as roof boxes or sports equipment.

8. Sunroof and Spoiler (Varies by Trim): Depending on the variant, certain models may have offered a sunroof for added ventilation and a rear spoiler for an extra touch of style.

9. Exterior Colors: The Minica Toppo was available in a range of exterior colors, providing buyers with options to personalize the vehicle's appearance to their liking.

The exterior styling of the 1996-1998 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 Q3 was characterized by its practicality and efficiency, aligning with its role as a compact urban minivan. It offered a blend of functionality and style, making it a reliable and visually appealing choice for city dwellers seeking a versatile and agile vehicle.

Safety Features: Keeping You Protected

Let's explore the safety features integrated into the 1996-1998 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 Q3, emphasizing their role in ensuring the well-being of drivers and passengers.

Safety Features - Keeping You Protected:

1. Driver's Airbag: The Minica Toppo was equipped with a standard driver's airbag, providing protection in the event of a frontal collision. This airbag deployed to cushion the driver and reduce the risk of injury.

2. Side Impact Bar: The vehicle featured side impact bars, which reinforced the doors and body structure to enhance protection in the event of a side collision.

3. Central Power Window Control: The centralized power window control allowed the driver to lock or unlock all windows, improving safety by preventing unwanted operation by passengers, especially children.

4. Additional Stop Light: Some models offered an additional stoplight, typically mounted at the rear window. This extra brake light improved visibility to drivers behind the Minica Toppo, reducing the chances of rear-end collisions.

5. Safety Engineering: Mitsubishi designed the Minica Toppo with safety engineering principles in mind, ensuring that the vehicle met or exceeded safety standards of the time. These included crashworthiness and structural integrity.

6. Braking System: While specific details of the braking system may vary by model, the Minica Toppo's braking components were designed to provide responsive and reliable stopping power, contributing to overall safety.

7. Tire Safety: Tire quality and maintenance are critical for safety. Properly inflated and well-maintained tires helped ensure good traction and stability on the road.

8. Seat Belts: The vehicle came equipped with seat belts for all passengers, further enhancing safety during driving.

9. Child Safety: The Minica Toppo accommodated child safety seats, allowing families to secure young passengers properly.

10. Traffic Safety Compliance: Depending on the market region, the vehicle adhered to local safety regulations and standards, ensuring that it met safety requirements specific to the area.

These safety features collectively contributed to the Minica Toppo 660 Q3's reputation as a reliable and secure choice for urban transportation. While compact in size, Mitsubishi prioritized safety, making it an appealing option for drivers seeking both efficiency and peace of mind on the road.

Conclusion: Summing Up the 1996-1998 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 Q3

As we wrap up our exploration of the 1996-1998 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 Q3, it becomes evident that this compact minivan held a special place in the automotive landscape of its time. Let's sum up the key points that define this vehicle:

Efficient Urban Commuter: The Minica Toppo 660 Q3 was purpose-built for efficient urban commuting. Its compact size, excellent fuel economy, and agile handling made it an ideal choice for navigating crowded city streets.

Compact Practicality: Despite its small footprint, the Minica Toppo maximized interior space, offering versatile seating configurations and ample cargo capacity. Sliding rear doors added to its practicality.

Fuel Efficiency: This minivan was renowned for its impressive fuel efficiency, particularly in city driving conditions. It consumed less fuel while delivering reliable performance.

Safety Considerations: Safety was not overlooked, with features such as a driver's airbag, side impact bars, and central power window control contributing to occupant protection.

Customization Options: Buyers had choices when it came to trim levels and variants, allowing them to tailor the Minica Toppo to their specific needs and budgets.

Adaptability to Markets: The availability of right-hand drive and left-hand drive versions ensured that this vehicle could find a place in diverse markets around the world.

Simple and Practical Design: The Minica Toppo sported a simple and practical design, emphasizing function over extravagance. It was an embodiment of Mitsubishi's commitment to producing reliable and cost-effective vehicles.

In conclusion, the 1996-1998 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 Q3 served as a testament to Mitsubishi's dedication to providing efficient and practical urban transportation solutions. Its small size, fuel efficiency, and thoughtful features made it a popular choice for city dwellers seeking an economical and reliable daily driver.

Frequently Asked Questions About the 1996-1998 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 Q3

What are the key features of the 1996 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 Q3?

The 1996 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 Q3 was known for its compact size, efficient 659 cm³ engine, and practicality. It offered features like sliding rear doors, power steering, and a driver's airbag for safety.

Were there any special editions or variants of the 1996 Minica Toppo 660 Q3?

In 1996, the Minica Toppo 660 Q3 primarily came in standard and mid-level trims. Special editions were not as common in this model year, with the focus being on the core features and efficiency.

How did the 1997 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 Q3 differ from the 1996 model?

The 1997 model likely saw minor updates and refinements based on user feedback. These could include improvements in materials, build quality, or minor design tweaks to enhance the overall experience.

Did the 1997 Minica Toppo 660 Q3 introduce any new engine options?

No significant changes were made to the engine options in the 1997 model. It likely continued with the efficient 659 cm³ engine known for its reliability and fuel efficiency.

Were there any notable safety upgrades in the 1997 Minica Toppo 660 Q3?

While specific safety features may have remained consistent, manufacturers often used the second model year to fine-tune safety engineering and ensure the vehicle met or exceeded safety standards.

What were the available trim levels for the 1998 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 Q3?

The 1998 Minica Toppo 660 Q3 typically offered a range of trim levels, including a base model, mid-level trims, and top-end trims, each with varying features and options to cater to different preferences.

Did the 1998 model year bring any special editions or limited variants?

In the 1998 model year, manufacturers might have introduced special editions or limited variants as a way to mark the end of the production cycle. These could include unique styling elements or exclusive features.

What can we expect in terms of fuel efficiency from the 1998 Minica Toppo 660 Q3?

The 1998 model was likely the most polished version, and its fuel efficiency would have remained a strong selling point, with an impressive MPG rating both in city and highway driving.

Were there any significant design changes in the 1998 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 Q3?

While the core design remained consistent, the 1998 model might have featured final touches or styling refinements to enhance its visual appeal before discontinuation.

How did the 1998 Minica Toppo 660 Q3 adapt to different markets in terms of drive configuration?

The availability of both right-hand drive (RHD) and left-hand drive (LHD) versions ensured that the Minica Toppo could cater to various regional preferences and traffic regulations, making it adaptable to different markets.


Brian Wong - Senior Reviews Editor of cars-directory.net

Brian Wong / Author

Brian Wong is an accomplished automotive journalist and editor with a passion for cars. With over a decade of experience in the industry, he has established himself as a trusted voice in the automotive community. Brian has written extensively about a wide range of topics in the field, from the latest trends in car design to innovative safety features and emerging technologies. As a senior reviews editor, he is responsible for test driving and analyzing the latest cars on the market, providing readers with accurate and objective reviews. His articles are widely read and respected for their depth of knowledge and analysis. Brian is committed to staying at the forefront of the latest developments in the automotive industry, and is dedicated to sharing his expertise and insights with his readers.

Add Comment

 * - The field should be filled
* Your Name:
 Contact (e-mail, phone...):
* Comments:
Photos: