1992 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 Qc Specs
OVERVIEW
With a fuel consumption of 38.5 mpg US - 46.3 mpg UK - 6.1 L/100km, a weight of 1631 lbs (740 kg), the Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 Qc has a water cooling 3 cylinder DOHC20 valve engine, a Regular gasoline engine 3G83. This engine 3G83 produces a maximum power of 52.7 PS (52 bhp - 38.7 kW) at 7500 rpm and a maximum torque of 55.8 Nm (41.2 lb.ft - 5.7 kg.m) at 5700 rpm. The engine power is transmitted to the road by the front wheel drive (FF) with a 3AT gearbox. For stopping power, the Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 Qc braking system includes Leading trailing drum brake at the rear and Disk at the front. Stock tire sizes are 135S on 12 inch rims at the rear and 135S on 12 inch rims at the front. Chassis details - Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 Qc has 3 link rear suspension and strut front suspension for road holding and ride confort.
Add to compare listGENERAL INFORMATION | |
---|---|
Complectation Name | 660 Qc |
Period of Production | Jan 1992 - Aug 1993 |
Drive Wheels - Traction - Drivetrain | FF |
Body Type | Minivan (2 row seats) |
Transmission Gearbox - Number of Speeds | 3AT |
Engine Size - Displacement - Engine Capacity | 657 cm3 or 40 cu-in |
Frame Name | E-H22A |
Price of New Car in Tokyo, Yen | 1221000 |
MITSUBISHI MINICA TOPPO 660 QC SIZE, DIMENSIONS AND WEIGHT | |
Exterior Length | 329.5 cm or 129.72 inches |
Exterior Width | 139.5 cm or 54.92 inches |
Exterior Height | 174 cm or 68.5 inches |
Interior Length | 176.5 cm or 69.48 inches |
Interior Width | 121 cm or 47.63 inches |
Interior Height | 141.5 cm or 55.7 inches |
Wheelbase | 226 cm or 88.97 inches |
Front Axle Length | 121.5 cm or 47.83 inches |
Rear Axle Length | 121.5 cm or 47.83 inches |
Ride Height - Ground Clearance | 15.5 cm or 6.1 inches |
Weight | 740 kg or 1631 lbs |
Num. of Seats | 4 |
Num. of Doors | 3 |
Minimum Turning Circle - Turning Diameter, m | 4.2 |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 8.4 US gallons 7 UK gallons 32 L |
MITSUBISHI MINICA TOPPO 660 QC ENGINE TECHNICAL DATA | |
Engine Code | 3G83 |
Maximum Power - Output - Horsepower | 52.7 PS or 52 bhp or 38.7 kW |
Maximum Power RPM | 7500 rpm |
Maximum Torque | 55.8 Nm or 41.2 lb.ft or 5.7 kg.m |
Maximum Torque RPM | 5700 rpm |
Engine Type - Number of Cylinders | water cooling 3 cylinder DOHC20 valve |
Fuel Type | Regular gasoline |
Fuel Consumption (10/15 mode) | 38.5 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK 6.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption (60 km/h mode) | 54.7 mpg US 65.6 mpg UK 4.3 L/100km |
1st Gear Ratio | 2.846 |
2nd Gear Ratio | 1.581 |
3rd Gear Ratio | 1 |
Rear Gear Ratio | 2.176 |
Compression Ratio | 10 |
Bore | 6.5 cm or 2.55 inches |
Stroke | 6.6 cm or 2.59 inches |
MITSUBISHI MINICA TOPPO 660 QC SUSPENSION | |
Front Brakes - Disc Dimensions | Disk |
Rear Brakes - DisΡ Dimensions | Leading trailing drum brake |
Front Suspension | strut |
Rear Suspension | 3 link |
Front Tyres - Rims Dimensions | 135S R12 |
Rear Tyres - Rims Dimensions | 135S R12 |
Tyres - Rims Dimensions | 145 / 70 R12 69S |
Aluminium Disk | |
MITSUBISHI MINICA TOPPO 660 QC EXTERIOR | |
Sunroof | |
Tilt Sunroof | |
Twin Sunroof | |
Front Spoiler | |
Rear Spoiler | |
Power Adjustable Door Mirrors | |
Xenon Lamps | |
Front Fog Lamps | |
Rear Fog Lamps | |
Cornering Lamps | |
Ultraviolet Glass Protection | |
Roof Rail | |
Back Wiper | |
MITSUBISHI MINICA TOPPO 660 QC INTERIOR | |
Power Window | |
Power Steering | |
Tachometer | |
Centralized Door Lock | |
Keyless Enter | |
Right Hand Drive | |
Left Hand Drive | |
Leather Winding | |
Adjustable Steering | |
Telescopic Steering | |
Tilt Steering | |
Wood Panel | |
Cruise Control | |
Leather Seat | |
Power Adjustable Seats | |
Power Ajustable Front Seat | |
Power Ajustable Back Seat | |
Reclining Seats | |
Removable Seats | |
Turning Seats | |
MITSUBISHI MINICA TOPPO 660 QC SAFETY | |
Drivers Airbag | |
Passengers Airbag | |
Side Airbag | |
Side Impact Bar | |
TCS | |
Break Assist | |
Parking Radar | |
Central Power Window Control | |
Additional Stop Light | |
Safety Belt Pretensioner | |
Safety Belt Limiter | |
3 Point Safety Belt | |
Child Car Restraints | |
Durable Frame | |
AMENITY | |
Cooler | |
Automatic Air Conditioning | |
Twin Conditioning System | |
Air Purifier | |
Radio | |
Autoreverse Casette | |
CD Player | |
CD Changer | |
MD Palyer | |
MD Changer | |
OTHER | |
LSD | |
Front Stabilizer | |
Rear Stablilizer | |
Special Equipment | No |
- Present
- Option
- Not Present (or Dealer Option)
By Brian Wong, Reviewed by: Kurt Niebuhr, Updated on March 28, 2024
π Engine Specifications of the Minica Toppo 660 QC
π Dimensions and Sizes of the Vehicle
π Fuel Tank Capacity: How Much Can It Hold?
π Fuel Consumption: How Efficient Is It?
π Exploring the Engine Options
π Fuel Capacity: Understanding the Limits
π MPG (Miles Per Gallon) Ratings
π Wheel Options and Sizes
π Fuel Average: Calculating Your Costs
π Trim Levels and Variants
π Generational Changes and Upgrades
π Notable Features and Options
π Performance and Handling
π Conclusion: The 1992-1993 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 QC in Summary
π Frequently Asked Questions About the 1992-Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 QC
Introduction to the 1992-1993 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 QC
The 1992-1993 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 QC was a compact minivan designed for urban maneuverability and efficiency. This vehicle, produced between January 1992 and August 1993, catered to the needs of city dwellers and commuters seeking a practical yet economical transportation solution.One of the standout features of the Minica Toppo 660 QC was its front-wheel-drive (FF) drivetrain, which provided good traction on city streets and contributed to its nimble handling. The compact minivan was designed with two rows of seats, accommodating up to four passengers comfortably.
Under the hood, you'd find a 657 cmΓΒ³ (cubic centimeters) engine with a DOHC (Double Overhead Camshaft) configuration featuring 20 valves. This engine, coded as 3G83, generated a respectable 52.7 PS (metric horsepower) or approximately 52 brake horsepower (bhp) at 7500 rpm. It also delivered a maximum torque of 55.8 Nm (Newton-meters) at 5700 rpm, providing sufficient power for urban driving.
The Minica Toppo 660 QC boasted efficient fuel consumption figures, with a rating of 38.5 mpg US in the 10/15 mode or 46.3 mpg UK, making it a cost-effective choice for daily commuting. Additionally, the 3-speed automatic transmission (3AT) offered smooth gear shifts and ease of operation in city traffic.
In terms of size and dimensions, this compact minivan measured approximately 329.5 cm in length, 139.5 cm in width, and 174 cm in height, making it well-suited for urban parking and maneuvering. Inside the cabin, passengers enjoyed a length of 176.5 cm, a width of 121 cm, and a height of 141.5 cm. The wheelbase spanned 226 cm, contributing to stability on the road.
The Minica Toppo 660 QC featured a rear spoiler and front fog lamps as part of its exterior styling. It rolled on 135S R12 tires for both front and rear, providing a balanced and comfortable ride.
Inside the cabin, standard amenities included power windows, power steering, a tachometer, centralized door locks, and reclining seats for added comfort. Safety features comprised side impact bars, a 3-point safety belt system, and child car restraints.
This Mitsubishi minivan offered practicality, efficiency, and maneuverability, making it a notable choice for those navigating the bustling city streets of its time.
Engine Specifications of the Minica Toppo 660 QC
The engine specifications of the 1992-1993 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 QC played a pivotal role in defining the performance and efficiency of this compact minivan. Under the hood of this urban-friendly vehicle resided a compact powerplant designed to balance power and fuel economy.At the heart of the Minica Toppo 660 QC was the 657 cmΓΒ³ (cubic centimeters) engine with the engine code 3G83. This powerplant was a testament to efficiency, featuring a water-cooled 3-cylinder design with DOHC (Double Overhead Camshaft) technology. With a total of 20 valves, it optimized the intake and exhaust processes for improved performance.
The engine delivered a maximum power output of 52.7 PS (metric horsepower), which translates to approximately 52 brake horsepower (bhp). This power was achieved at a high revving 7500 rpm, allowing the vehicle to navigate urban traffic with ease.
Complementing the power output was a peak torque of 55.8 Nm (Newton-meters) or approximately 41.2 lb.ft (pound-feet) of torque at 5700 rpm. This torque figure contributed to the Minica Toppo 660 QC's responsiveness during acceleration and ensured efficient performance in stop-and-go city driving.
Fuel efficiency was a highlight of this engine, with a fuel consumption rating of 38.5 mpg US in the 10/15 mode or 46.3 mpg UK, equivalent to approximately 6.1 L/100km. This made the Minica Toppo 660 QC a frugal choice for daily commuting, keeping fuel costs in check for urban dwellers.
The engine featured a 3-speed automatic transmission (3AT), which offered smooth gear shifts and simplified operation, ideal for city driving conditions. Additionally, the compact size and lightweight construction of the engine contributed to the overall maneuverability and efficiency of the vehicle.
In summary, the engine specifications of the 1992-1993 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 QC were tailored to meet the demands of urban mobility, striking a balance between power, fuel efficiency, and responsive performance, making it a practical choice for city commuters of its era.
Dimensions and Sizes of the Vehicle
The dimensions and sizes of the 1992-1993 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 QC were tailored to make this compact minivan a practical and maneuverable choice for urban commuting. With its compact footprint, it was designed to navigate through city streets with ease.Measuring approximately 329.5 cm in length, 139.5 cm in width, and 174 cm in height, the Minica Toppo 660 QC was compact enough to fit into tight parking spaces while providing ample interior space for passengers and cargo. This compact size made it well-suited for urban driving, where maneuverability is often key.
Inside the cabin, passengers enjoyed an interior length of around 176.5 cm, a width of about 121 cm, and a height of approximately 141.5 cm. These dimensions ensured a comfortable and spacious interior for a compact minivan, allowing occupants to sit comfortably during city commutes.
The wheelbase, spanning 226 cm, contributed to stability on the road, enhancing the vehicle's overall handling and ride quality. The front and rear axles both measured approximately 121.5 cm in length, further contributing to the vehicle's balanced and stable stance.
The ride height, or ground clearance, of the Minica Toppo 660 QC was approximately 15.5 cm, providing adequate clearance to navigate city streets and occasional uneven surfaces. This ride height was well-suited for city driving conditions.
Weighing in at approximately 740 kg (kilograms) or 1631 lbs (pounds), this compact minivan was relatively lightweight, which not only contributed to its fuel efficiency but also made it easy to handle in urban traffic.
The Minica Toppo 660 QC featured three doors and could accommodate up to four passengers comfortably. With a minimum turning circle of 4.2 meters, it had a tight turning radius, making it agile and easy to maneuver in congested city environments.
In terms of fuel capacity, it could hold up to 8.4 US gallons of fuel, equivalent to 7 UK gallons or 32 liters, which was suitable for daily urban commuting, minimizing the need for frequent refueling.
In summary, the dimensions and sizes of the 1992-1993 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 QC were thoughtfully designed to provide urban drivers with a compact yet spacious and maneuverable vehicle, ideal for navigating city streets and tight parking spaces.
Fuel Tank Capacity: How Much Can It Hold?
The fuel tank capacity of the 1992-1993 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 QC was a key consideration for those looking for a practical and cost-effective urban commuting vehicle. This compact minivan was designed to strike a balance between size and fuel efficiency, making it an economical choice for city driving.The Minica Toppo 660 QC featured a fuel tank with a capacity of approximately 8.4 US gallons, which is equivalent to 7 UK gallons or approximately 32 liters. This capacity allowed the vehicle to store a sufficient amount of fuel for daily city commutes, reducing the need for frequent refueling stops.
With this fuel tank capacity, drivers of the Minica Toppo 660 QC could cover a considerable distance on a single tank of fuel, which was especially advantageous for urban dwellers who often navigate congested city streets where refueling opportunities may be limited.
The combination of a compact and fuel-efficient engine, along with the moderate fuel tank capacity, contributed to the overall cost-effectiveness of owning and operating the Minica Toppo 660 QC in an urban setting. It offered the convenience of fewer stops at the fuel pump and minimized fuel expenses, aligning with the needs of city commuters seeking practical transportation solutions.
In summary, the 1992-1993 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 QC's fuel tank capacity of approximately 8.4 US gallons struck a balance between size and efficiency, making it an economical choice for urban driving by providing sufficient fuel storage for daily commutes.
Fuel Consumption: How Efficient Is It?
Fuel consumption was a significant consideration for urban commuters considering the 1992-1993 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 QC. This compact minivan was designed with efficiency in mind, making it an economical choice for those navigating the city streets.The Minica Toppo 660 QC delivered impressive fuel efficiency figures, catering to the needs of city drivers concerned about rising fuel costs and environmental impact. In the 10/15 mode, it achieved a fuel consumption rating of approximately 38.5 mpg US or 46.3 mpg UK, which translates to approximately 6.1 L/100km.
For city dwellers, these figures were particularly appealing, as they indicated that the Minica Toppo 660 QC could cover a significant distance on a gallon of fuel. The efficient use of fuel also meant fewer trips to the gas station, enhancing the convenience of daily commuting.
In highway conditions or at a constant speed of 60 km/h, the Minica Toppo 660 QC demonstrated even greater fuel efficiency, with a rating of approximately 54.7 mpg US or 65.6 mpg UK, equivalent to about 4.3 L/100km. This highlighted the vehicle's ability to optimize fuel usage during steady-state cruising, making it an ideal choice for highway journeys as well.
The efficient fuel consumption figures of the Minica Toppo 660 QC were a result of its compact and lightweight design, coupled with an engine that was engineered for urban efficiency. This combination not only reduced the environmental footprint but also contributed to cost savings for drivers.
In summary, the 1992-1993 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 QC showcased remarkable fuel efficiency, offering urban commuters an economical and environmentally conscious choice. Whether navigating city streets or cruising on the highway, this compact minivan was designed to maximize fuel economy while delivering practical transportation solutions.
Exploring the Engine Options
Exploring the engine options of the 1992-1993 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 QC reveals the heart of this compact minivan's performance and efficiency. While the model primarily featured a single engine option, it was designed to cater to the specific needs of urban drivers.Under the hood of the Minica Toppo 660 QC, you'd find a compact yet capable 657 cmΓΒ³ (cubic centimeters) engine, denoted by the engine code 3G83. This engine was a testament to efficiency, featuring a water-cooled 3-cylinder design with DOHC (Double Overhead Camshaft) technology and a total of 20 valves. This configuration optimized the engine's performance and fuel efficiency, ensuring it met the demands of city driving.
The engine delivered a maximum power output of 52.7 PS (metric horsepower) or approximately 52 brake horsepower (bhp) at a high-revving 7500 rpm. This power output, while modest, was well-suited for urban environments, providing sufficient acceleration and responsiveness.
Complementing the power output was a peak torque of 55.8 Nm (Newton-meters), which is approximately 41.2 lb.ft (pound-feet) of torque, generated at 5700 rpm. This torque figure contributed to the engine's responsiveness during acceleration, allowing for agile city driving.
The engine operated on regular gasoline, making it convenient for drivers to refuel without the need for premium fuel options. Its efficiency was further underscored by impressive fuel consumption ratings, making it an economical choice for urban commuters.
While the Minica Toppo 660 QC primarily featured a single engine option, its efficient and compact powerplant was carefully designed to meet the specific requirements of city driving. It balanced power, fuel economy, and responsive performance, making it a practical choice for those navigating the bustling streets of urban environments.
Fuel Capacity: Understanding the Limits
Fuel capacity was a key consideration for drivers of the 1992-1993 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 QC, as it determined how far they could travel on a single tank of fuel. Understanding the limits of the fuel capacity was essential for planning long trips and daily commutes.The Minica Toppo 660 QC featured a fuel tank with a capacity of approximately 8.4 US gallons, which is equivalent to 7 UK gallons or approximately 32 liters. This capacity allowed drivers to store a sufficient amount of fuel for their journeys, whether it be city commuting or longer highway trips.
With this fuel tank capacity, the Minica Toppo 660 QC was well-suited for daily city driving, as it reduced the need for frequent refueling stops. Urban commuters could rely on a single tank of fuel to cover their daily distances, enhancing the convenience of ownership.
For longer highway journeys, the vehicle's fuel capacity still provided a reasonable range before needing to refuel. This meant that drivers could embark on road trips with confidence, knowing they had the capacity to cover substantial distances without the constant need for refueling.
Understanding the limits of the fuel capacity also played a role in budgeting and cost management. Drivers could plan their fuel expenses more effectively, knowing how far they could travel on a full tank and making informed decisions about when and where to refuel.
In summary, the 1992-1993 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 QC offered a practical fuel capacity of approximately 8.4 US gallons, allowing drivers to cover both daily commutes and longer journeys without the constant need for refueling. This understanding of fuel limits contributed to the convenience and cost-effectiveness of owning and operating the vehicle.
MPG (Miles Per Gallon) Ratings
The MPG (Miles Per Gallon) ratings of the 1992-1993 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 QC were a significant point of interest for prospective buyers, especially those seeking a fuel-efficient vehicle for city driving and beyond. These ratings provided valuable insights into the vehicle's efficiency and helped drivers manage their fuel costs effectively.In urban driving conditions, often characterized by stop-and-go traffic, the Minica Toppo 660 QC showcased impressive fuel efficiency. It achieved a fuel consumption rating of approximately 38.5 mpg US or 46.3 mpg UK, equivalent to roughly 6.1 L/100km. This rating meant that the vehicle could cover a substantial distance on a gallon of fuel, reducing the frequency of refueling stops during daily commutes.
On the open highway, where steady-state cruising was the norm, the Minica Toppo 660 QC continued to deliver excellent fuel efficiency. At a constant speed of 60 km/h, it achieved a fuel consumption rating of approximately 54.7 mpg US or 65.6 mpg UK, which translates to about 4.3 L/100km. This exceptional highway rating made it a cost-effective choice for longer journeys.
The MPG ratings of the Minica Toppo 660 QC were a result of its compact and lightweight design, coupled with an efficient engine that was engineered to optimize fuel usage. These ratings not only appealed to budget-conscious drivers but also contributed to a reduced environmental impact by conserving fuel resources.
Drivers of the Minica Toppo 660 QC could rely on these MPG ratings as a measure of its fuel efficiency, allowing them to plan their journeys with confidence and manage their fuel expenses effectively. Whether navigating the busy streets of the city or embarking on highway adventures, this compact minivan offered impressive fuel economy throughout its various driving scenarios.
Wheel Options and Sizes
Wheel options and sizes played a vital role in the overall performance and aesthetics of the 1992-1993 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 QC. These components were essential not only for providing stability and handling but also for enhancing the vehicle's visual appeal.The Minica Toppo 660 QC featured wheel options that were designed to complement its compact and practical design. The tire size for both the front and rear wheels was 135S R12. This size struck a balance between maneuverability and ride comfort, making it well-suited for urban driving conditions.
The use of 12-inch wheels contributed to the vehicle's agility, allowing it to navigate tight city streets and parking spaces with ease. The 135S tire width provided sufficient traction while maintaining a comfortable ride quality for passengers.
The choice of tire dimensions also played a role in the vehicle's overall handling and stability. The combination of wheel size and tire width ensured that the Minica Toppo 660 QC offered responsive steering and control, enhancing the driving experience in urban environments.
The use of 12-inch wheels and appropriate tire dimensions was in line with the vehicle's design philosophy, emphasizing practicality and efficiency for city commuters. It struck a balance between performance and comfort, making it a well-rounded choice for those navigating urban streets and beyond.
In summary, the wheel options and sizes of the 1992-1993 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 QC were carefully selected to provide a balance of stability, maneuverability, and comfort. These components not only contributed to the vehicle's performance but also complemented its practical and compact design, making it a suitable choice for urban driving.
Fuel Average: Calculating Your Costs
Fuel average, or fuel efficiency, was a critical factor for budget-conscious drivers considering the 1992-1993 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 QC. Understanding the fuel average allowed drivers to calculate their costs accurately and make informed decisions about their daily commute expenses.The Minica Toppo 660 QC excelled in terms of fuel average, thanks to its compact size and efficient engine. In the 10/15 mode, it achieved a fuel consumption rating of approximately 38.5 mpg US or 46.3 mpg UK, which is roughly 6.1 L/100km. This rating meant that for every gallon of fuel consumed, the vehicle could cover a considerable distance, making it a cost-effective choice for city commuting.
On the highway, where steady-state cruising prevailed, the Minica Toppo 660 QC continued to demonstrate impressive fuel efficiency. At a constant speed of 60 km/h, it achieved a fuel consumption rating of approximately 54.7 mpg US or 65.6 mpg UK, equivalent to about 4.3 L/100km. This remarkable highway rating made it an economical option for longer journeys, helping drivers save on fuel expenses.
To calculate their fuel costs accurately, drivers could use the fuel average figures to estimate their daily, weekly, or monthly expenses. By multiplying the fuel consumption rating by the cost of fuel per gallon or liter, they could determine how much they would spend on fuel during their commutes.
Understanding the Minica Toppo 660 QC's fuel average was not only a matter of budgeting but also contributed to reducing the vehicle's environmental footprint. Efficient fuel usage translated to lower emissions, aligning with the growing emphasis on sustainability and responsible driving practices.
In summary, the 1992-1993 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 QC's impressive fuel average figures allowed drivers to calculate their fuel costs accurately. Whether for daily city commutes or longer highway journeys, the vehicle's efficiency made it a cost-effective and environmentally conscious choice for those seeking practical transportation solutions.
Trim Levels and Variants
The 1992-1993 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 QC was offered with various trim levels and variants to cater to the diverse needs and preferences of potential buyers. These trim levels and variants allowed customers to choose the one that best suited their requirements, whether they were focused on budget, features, or specific amenities.One of the notable aspects of the Minica Toppo 660 QC was its practicality and simplicity. It primarily featured a single trim level, which was the "660 QC." This trim level offered a straightforward and functional package designed for urban commuting. It was equipped with essential features for a comfortable driving experience within the city, making it an economical choice for daily transportation needs.
While the trim level options were relatively limited, customers had the flexibility to choose from various exterior and interior color options to personalize their Minica Toppo 660 QC. This allowed buyers to select a color scheme that matched their preferences and style.
Additionally, some variants of the Minica Toppo 660 QC may have featured specific optional accessories or customization options, such as alloy wheels or unique interior finishes. These allowed buyers to add a touch of individuality to their vehicles.
Overall, the 1992-1993 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 QC offered a simple yet practical approach to trim levels and variants. It focused on providing a reliable and cost-effective solution for urban commuting while allowing customers to personalize their vehicles to some extent through color and optional accessories.
Generational Changes and Upgrades
The 1992-1993 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 QC maintained a sense of continuity with its predecessors while introducing some notable changes and upgrades that enhanced its appeal in the competitive minivan market.1. Introduction of the 660 QC: The Minica Toppo 660 QC was a unique addition to the Mitsubishi lineup during this period. It offered a compact yet practical minivan option, catering to urban commuters and families seeking an economical and space-efficient vehicle.
2. Engine Efficiency: One of the key upgrades in this generation was the focus on engine efficiency. The 657 cmΓΒ³ engine with the 3G83 engine code featured DOHC technology with 20 valves, optimizing performance and fuel efficiency. This improvement allowed the vehicle to deliver a responsive yet economical driving experience.
3. Fuel Efficiency: The Minica Toppo 660 QC showcased impressive fuel efficiency ratings, making it a cost-effective choice for city driving. With exceptional MPG (Miles Per Gallon) figures in both urban and highway conditions, it appealed to drivers conscious of fuel expenses.
4. Compact Dimensions: The vehicle's compact dimensions remained consistent with its predecessors, emphasizing maneuverability and ease of parking in urban environments. The wheelbase, width, and height were carefully balanced to provide adequate interior space while maintaining a small footprint.
5. Practical Features: The trim levels primarily focused on practicality, offering essential features for comfortable commuting. While there were limited trim options, customers could personalize their vehicles through color choices and optional accessories.
6. Environmental Considerations: With a focus on fuel efficiency, the Minica Toppo 660 QC aligned with the growing emphasis on environmental sustainability. Its efficient use of fuel contributed to reduced emissions and a smaller carbon footprint.
In summary, the 1992-1993 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 QC represented a generation of minivans that retained the practicality and compact size of its predecessors while introducing engine improvements and fuel efficiency. These changes and upgrades made it a compelling choice for urban commuters and families seeking a cost-effective and environmentally conscious transportation solution.
Notable Features and Options
The 1992-1993 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 QC boasted a range of notable features and options that catered to the practical needs and preferences of its drivers and passengers. While the focus was on delivering economical urban transportation, the vehicle still offered some noteworthy elements:1. Compact Dimensions: The Minica Toppo 660 QC retained its compact size, making it an ideal choice for navigating through congested city streets and fitting into tight parking spaces. Its exterior length of 329.5 cm and width of 139.5 cm contributed to its maneuverability.
2. Spacious Interior: Despite its small exterior, the interior of the vehicle provided a comfortable cabin for up to four passengers. With an interior length of 176.5 cm and a width of 121 cm, it ensured that occupants had sufficient space to sit comfortably during city commutes.
3. Fuel Efficiency: One of the standout features of the Minica Toppo 660 QC was its exceptional fuel efficiency. Whether in city traffic or on the highway, the vehicle showcased impressive MPG (Miles Per Gallon) ratings, allowing drivers to save on fuel costs.
4. Variety of Colors: Customers had the option to choose from a range of exterior and interior colors, allowing them to personalize their vehicles to some extent. This customization feature added a touch of individuality to the practical minivan.
5. Front and Rear Spoilers: The vehicle featured a rear spoiler as a standard option, which not only added to its aesthetics but also contributed to improved aerodynamics. Front spoilers, however, were not included.
6. Front Fog Lamps: Front fog lamps were a standard feature on the Minica Toppo 660 QC, enhancing visibility during adverse weather conditions and adding an element of safety to city driving.
7. Rear Wiper: The inclusion of a rear wiper was a practical addition, ensuring that the rear window remained clear, especially in rainy or snowy weather.
8. Power Windows and Steering: Standard power windows and power steering added convenience to the driving experience, making it easier for the driver to control the vehicle and adjust the windows as needed.
9. Safety Features: While it didn't have advanced safety features like airbags or TCS (Traction Control System), the vehicle did come equipped with standard safety features such as side impact bars, 3-point safety belts, and child car restraints, enhancing occupant protection.
In summary, the 1992-1993 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 QC prioritized practicality, fuel efficiency, and basic features to meet the needs of urban commuters. While it may not have been loaded with advanced options, its compact size, fuel economy, and essential features made it a cost-effective and convenient choice for city driving.
Performance and Handling
The 1992-1993 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 QC, though primarily designed for practical urban commuting, offered a commendable balance of performance and handling to meet the demands of city driving.1. Engine Efficiency: The Minica Toppo 660 QC was equipped with a compact 657 cmΓΒ³ engine featuring a 3-cylinder DOHC configuration with 20 valves. While not a high-performance powerhouse, this engine was engineered for efficiency, ensuring that it delivered adequate power for city driving while optimizing fuel consumption.
2. Responsive Acceleration: The engine's design allowed for responsive acceleration, making it suitable for quick maneuvers in city traffic. It provided sufficient power to navigate through congested streets and merge onto highways with confidence.
3. Compact Dimensions: The vehicle's compact exterior dimensions played a crucial role in its handling capabilities. With a wheelbase of 226 cm and a relatively small width, the Minica Toppo 660 QC was agile and easy to maneuver, making it well-suited for urban environments.
4. Tight Turning Radius: With a minimum turning circle of approximately 4.2 meters, the Minica Toppo 660 QC excelled at executing U-turns and navigating through tight corners. This feature enhanced its overall maneuverability and made parking in crowded areas more convenient.
5. Stable Suspension: The vehicle's front suspension featured a strut design, while the rear suspension utilized a 3-link setup. These suspension configurations, combined with appropriately sized wheels and tires, contributed to a stable and comfortable ride, even on rough city roads.
6. Safety Considerations: While not a high-performance sports car, the Minica Toppo 660 QC incorporated safety features such as side impact bars and 3-point safety belts to enhance occupant protection.
7. Fuel Efficiency: The vehicle's fuel efficiency further added to its practicality. It excelled in both city and highway driving conditions, allowing drivers to save on fuel costs while still enjoying a reasonable level of performance.
In summary, the 1992-1993 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 QC struck a balance between performance and handling that was well-suited for urban commuting. Its compact size, responsive acceleration, and maneuverability, coupled with efficient fuel consumption, made it a practical choice for navigating the challenges of city driving while ensuring a comfortable and safe ride for passengers.
Conclusion: The 1992-1993 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 QC in Summary
The 1992-1993 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 QC, with its compact size and efficient design, offered a practical and economical solution for urban commuting during its production years. Here is a summary of its key attributes:1. Compact Urban Transport: The Minica Toppo 660 QC was designed with urban drivers in mind. Its compact dimensions, tight turning radius, and agile handling made it an ideal choice for navigating city streets and congested traffic.
2. Fuel Efficiency: Efficiency was a standout feature of this vehicle. With impressive MPG (Miles Per Gallon) ratings in both city and highway driving conditions, it helped drivers save on fuel costs, contributing to its economic appeal.
3. Practical Features: While not loaded with advanced features, the Minica Toppo 660 QC offered essential amenities such as power windows, power steering, and front fog lamps for a comfortable and convenient driving experience.
4. Customization Options: Customers had the flexibility to choose from various exterior and interior colors to personalize their vehicles, adding a touch of individuality to the practical minivan.
5. Safety Considerations: Standard safety features, including side impact bars and 3-point safety belts, provided a degree of occupant protection.
6. Environmental Consciousness: The vehicle's fuel efficiency and efficient engine design aligned with growing environmental concerns, contributing to reduced emissions and a smaller carbon footprint.
In conclusion, the 1992-1993 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 QC was a budget-friendly, fuel-efficient, and maneuverable option tailored to the demands of city living. Its simplicity and focus on practicality made it a cost-effective choice for those seeking reliable urban transportation without compromising on efficiency and comfort.
Frequently Asked Questions About the 1992-1993 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 QC
What are the key features that distinguish the 1992 and 1993 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 QC models?
How does the 1992 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 QC compare to the 1993 model in terms of fuel efficiency?
Are there any notable generational changes or upgrades between the 1992 and 1993 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 QC?
What are the available trim levels and variants for the 1992-1993 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 QC?
How does the 1992-1993 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 QC handle in city traffic and tight parking spaces?
Is the 1992-1993 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 QC environmentally friendly?
What safety features are included in the 1992-1993 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 QC?
Can I customize the exterior and interior of the 1992-1993 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 QC?
How does the 1992-1993 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 QC perform on the highway, and is it suitable for longer journeys?
Does the 1992-1993 Mitsubishi Minica Toppo 660 QC have any unique features that set it apart from other vehicles in its class?
Brian Wong / AuthorBrian Wong is an accomplished automotive journalist and editor with a passion for cars. With over a decade of experience in the industry, he has established himself as a trusted voice in the automotive community. Brian has written extensively about a wide range of topics in the field, from the latest trends in car design to innovative safety features and emerging technologies. As a senior reviews editor, he is responsible for test driving and analyzing the latest cars on the market, providing readers with accurate and objective reviews. His articles are widely read and respected for their depth of knowledge and analysis. Brian is committed to staying at the forefront of the latest developments in the automotive industry, and is dedicated to sharing his expertise and insights with his readers. |