1999 Mitsubishi Minicab 660 TL Specs
OVERVIEW
With a fuel consumption of 36.1 mpg US - 43.4 mpg UK - 6.5 L/100km, a weight of 1785 lbs (810 kg), the Mitsubishi Minicab 660 TL has a SOHC 12 valve 3 cylinder engine, a Regular gasoline engine 3G83. This engine 3G83 produces a maximum power of 48.6 PS (48 bhp - 35.7 kW) at 6000 rpm and a maximum torque of 61.7 Nm (45.5 lb.ft - 6.3 kg.m) at 4000 rpm. The engine power is transmitted to the road by the four wheel drive (4WD) with a 4AT gearbox. For stopping power, the Mitsubishi Minicab 660 TL braking system includes Leading trailing drum brake at the rear and Disk at the front. Chassis details - Mitsubishi Minicab 660 TL has semicircle leaf spring rear suspension and McPherson strut coil spring front suspension for road holding and ride confort.
Add to compare listGENERAL INFORMATION | |
---|---|
Complectation Name | 660 TL |
Period of Production | Jan 1999 - Oct 2000 |
Drive Wheels - Traction - Drivetrain | 4WD |
Body Type | Commercial Van |
Transmission Gearbox - Number of Speeds | 4AT |
Engine Size - Displacement - Engine Capacity | 657 cm3 or 40 cu-in |
Frame Name | GD-U62T |
MITSUBISHI MINICAB 660 TL SIZE, DIMENSIONS AND WEIGHT | |
Exterior Length | 339.5 cm or 133.66 inches |
Exterior Width | 147.5 cm or 58.07 inches |
Exterior Height | 177.5 cm or 69.88 inches |
Wheelbase | 220 cm or 86.61 inches |
Ride Height - Ground Clearance | 15 cm or 5.9 inches |
Weight | 810 kg or 1785 lbs |
Num. of Seats | 2 |
Num. of Doors | 2 |
Minimum Turning Circle - Turning Diameter, m | 4.4 |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 10.5 US gallons 8.7 UK gallons 40 L |
MITSUBISHI MINICAB 660 TL ENGINE TECHNICAL DATA | |
Engine Code | 3G83 |
Maximum Power - Output - Horsepower | 48.6 PS or 48 bhp or 35.7 kW |
Maximum Power RPM | 6000 rpm |
Maximum Torque | 61.7 Nm or 45.5 lb.ft or 6.3 kg.m |
Maximum Torque RPM | 4000 rpm |
Engine Type - Number of Cylinders | SOHC 12 valve 3 cylinder |
Fuel Type | Regular gasoline |
LEV | lean burn MVV |
Fuel Consumption (10/15 mode) | 36.1 mpg US 43.4 mpg UK 6.5 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption (60 km/h mode) | 48 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK 4.9 L/100km |
MITSUBISHI MINICAB 660 TL SUSPENSION | |
Front Brakes - Disc Dimensions | Disk |
Rear Brakes - DisΡ Dimensions | Leading trailing drum brake |
Front Suspension | McPherson strut coil spring |
Rear Suspension | semicircle leaf spring |
Tyres - Rims Dimensions | 145 R12-6PR |
Aluminium Disk | |
MITSUBISHI MINICAB 660 TL EXTERIOR | |
Sunroof | |
Tilt Sunroof | |
Twin Sunroof | |
Front Spoiler | |
Rear Spoiler | |
Power Adjustable Door Mirrors | |
Xenon Lamps | |
Front Fog Lamps | |
Rear Fog Lamps | |
Cornering Lamps | |
Ultraviolet Glass Protection | |
Roof Rail | |
MITSUBISHI MINICAB 660 TL INTERIOR | |
Power Window | |
Power Steering | |
Tachometer | |
Centralized Door Lock | |
Keyless Enter | |
Right Hand Drive | |
Left Hand Drive | |
Leather Winding | |
Adjustable Steering | |
Wood Panel | |
Cruise Control | |
Leather Seat | |
Power Adjustable Seats | |
Reclining Seats | |
Removable Seats | |
Turning Seats | |
MITSUBISHI MINICAB 660 TL SAFETY | |
Drivers Airbag | |
Passengers Airbag | |
Side Airbag | |
Side Impact Bar | |
TCS | |
Break Assist | |
Parking Radar | |
Central Power Window Control | |
Additional Stop Light | |
AMENITY | |
Cooler | |
Automatic Air Conditioning | |
Twin Conditioning System | |
Air Purifier | |
Radio | |
Autoreverse Casette | |
CD Player | |
CD Changer | |
MD Palyer | |
MD Changer | |
OTHER | |
LSD | |
Front Stabilizer | |
Rear Stablilizer | |
Special Equipment | No |
- Present
- Option
- Not Present (or Dealer Option)
By Brian Wong, Reviewed by: Kurt Niebuhr, Updated on March 28, 2024
π Engine Variants and Performance
π Fuel Efficiency and Consumption Rates
π Unveiling the Fuel Tank Capacity
π Dimensions and Sizes Overview
π Wheel Options and Configurations
π Unraveling the Fuel Average (MPG)
π Trim Levels and Features
π Driving Experience and Handling
π Conclusion: The Legacy of the Minicab 660 TL
π FAQ: Everything You Need to Know About the 1999-Mitsubishi Minicab 660 TL
Key Specifications of the Minicab 660 TL
Certainly, here is the detailed text about the "1999-2000 Mitsubishi Minicab 660 TL" focusing on its key specifications:The 1999-2000 Mitsubishi Minicab 660 TL, a compact and versatile commercial van, boasted a range of key specifications that catered to its intended utility-focused purpose. This vehicle, produced from January 1999 to October 2000, showcased impressive design and functional features.
Drivetrain and Transmission:
Equipped with a 4-wheel drive (4WD) system, the Minicab 660 TL offered enhanced traction, making it suitable for various terrains and conditions. The vehicle's transmission featured a 4-speed automatic gearbox (4AT), ensuring smooth and efficient gear shifts.
Engine Performance:
Under the hood, the Minicab 660 TL housed a compact 657 cm3 (40 cu-in) engine with the engine code 3G83. This SOHC (Single Overhead Cam) engine boasted 12 valves distributed across its 3 cylinders. The engine's power output reached a maximum of 48.6 PS (48 bhp or 35.7 kW) at 6000 rpm, accompanied by a peak torque of 61.7 Nm (45.5 lb.ft or 6.3 kg.m) at 4000 rpm. This engine configuration, combined with lean burn MVV (Mitsubishi Variable Valve) technology, contributed to the Minicab's commendable fuel efficiency.
Fuel Efficiency:
Speaking of fuel efficiency, the Minicab 660 TL excelled in this aspect. Its fuel consumption achieved impressive figures, with a reported 36.1 mpg US (43.4 mpg UK or 6.5 L/100km) under the 10/15 mode testing cycle. Additionally, during the 60 km/h mode, the vehicle showcased remarkable fuel consumption of 48 mpg US (57.6 mpg UK or 4.9 L/100km).
Dimensions and Weight:
The Minicab's exterior dimensions reflected its compact design. With an exterior length of 339.5 cm (133.66 inches) and an exterior width of 147.5 cm (58.07 inches), the vehicle efficiently utilized its space. The exterior height reached 177.5 cm (69.88 inches), while the wheelbase measured 220 cm (86.61 inches). A ride height of 15 cm (5.9 inches) and a weight of 810 kg (1785 lbs) further contributed to the Minicab's maneuverability and practicality.
Interior and Safety:
Inside, the Minicab 660 TL accommodated two seats and featured a standard power steering system. Safety features included an optional driver's airbag and passenger's airbag, as well as standard side impact bars.
Amenities and Special Equipment:
While lacking some luxury features like power windows and leather seats, the Minicab offered essential amenities such as air conditioning, and its equipment could be customized with options like a cooler and automatic air conditioning.
In conclusion, the 1999-2000 Mitsubishi Minicab 660 TL embodied a utilitarian spirit with its compact size, efficient engine, and functional features. Designed for commercial use, this vehicle's specifications underscored its ability to navigate diverse road conditions while providing practical amenities for drivers and passengers alike.
Engine Variants and Performance
Certainly, here's the detailed text about the "1999-2000 Mitsubishi Minicab 660 TL" focusing on its engine variants and performance:The heart of the 1999-2000 Mitsubishi Minicab 660 TL was its range of engine variants, each contributing to the vehicle's notable performance characteristics. Designed to balance power and efficiency, these engines defined the Minicab's capabilities on the road.
Engine Options:
The Minicab 660 TL was powered by a compact yet capable 657 cm3 (40 cu-in) engine. Specifically, the engine code 3G83 denoted its unique identity. This engine, featuring a SOHC (Single Overhead Cam) configuration, comprised 12 valves distributed across its 3 cylinders. This design facilitated efficient combustion and power delivery.
Performance Output:
The Minicab's engine delivered a maximum power output of 48.6 PS (48 bhp or 35.7 kW) at 6000 rpm, providing ample propulsion for a vehicle of its size and purpose. Complementing this power, the engine generated a peak torque of 61.7 Nm (45.5 lb.ft or 6.3 kg.m) at 4000 rpm. This torque ensured responsive acceleration and confident performance in various driving conditions.
Lean Burn MVV Technology:
One of the noteworthy features contributing to the Minicab's efficiency was its implementation of lean burn MVV (Mitsubishi Variable Valve) technology. This technology optimized the air-fuel mixture for combustion, enhancing fuel efficiency while minimizing emissions. The result was an impressive fuel consumption that aligned with the vehicle's commercial and utility-oriented role.
Fuel Efficiency:
The Minicab 660 TL excelled in fuel efficiency. In the 10/15 mode testing cycle, it achieved a fuel consumption of 36.1 mpg US (43.4 mpg UK or 6.5 L/100km). This efficiency was further highlighted during the 60 km/h mode, where the Minicab achieved a remarkable fuel consumption of 48 mpg US (57.6 mpg UK or 4.9 L/100km).
Conclusion:
The engine variants of the 1999-2000 Mitsubishi Minicab 660 TL showcased a balanced blend of power and efficiency. With its compact yet capable 657 cm3 engine and lean burn MVV technology, the Minicab demonstrated a performance profile tailored to its commercial van identity. This balance between performance and efficiency underscored the Minicab's suitability for navigating urban environments and fulfilling its utilitarian role.
Fuel Efficiency and Consumption Rates
Certainly, here's the detailed text about the "1999-2000 Mitsubishi Minicab 660 TL" focusing on its fuel efficiency and consumption rates:The 1999-2000 Mitsubishi Minicab 660 TL stood out as a testament to economical driving, showcasing impressive fuel efficiency that aligned with its utility-focused design. The vehicle's engine and technology were meticulously crafted to deliver exceptional consumption rates, making it a practical choice for both short-distance commuting and longer journeys.
Efficiency in Real-World Driving:
One of the defining features of the Minicab 660 TL was its commendable fuel efficiency across various driving scenarios. Designed with an emphasis on lean burn MVV (Mitsubishi Variable Valve) technology, the vehicle's engine optimized the air-fuel mixture for combustion. This resulted in efficient fuel utilization, ensuring that the Minicab delivered more miles for every gallon of fuel.
Fuel Consumption Ratings:
Under the 10/15 mode testing cycle, the Minicab 660 TL achieved an impressive fuel consumption rating of 36.1 mpg US (43.4 mpg UK or 6.5 L/100km). This cycle aimed to replicate city driving conditions, making the Minicab a reliable choice for navigating urban environments with frequent stops and starts.
Additionally, the Minicab excelled in fuel efficiency even during constant-speed highway driving. In the 60 km/h mode, the vehicle demonstrated remarkable fuel consumption figures of 48 mpg US (57.6 mpg UK or 4.9 L/100km). This efficiency made the Minicab well-suited for longer journeys, where maintaining a consistent speed further optimized its consumption rates.
Practicality and Cost-Effectiveness:
The Minicab's fuel efficiency wasn't just about numbersΓ’β¬βit translated into real-world cost savings and reduced environmental impact. With its efficient fuel utilization, the vehicle minimized the frequency of refueling stops, making it a practical choice for businesses and individuals seeking to manage operating costs.
Conclusion:
The 1999-2000 Mitsubishi Minicab 660 TL's exceptional fuel efficiency and consumption rates showcased its commitment to economical driving. With a thoughtfully designed engine and advanced technology, the Minicab delivered impressive mileage while contributing to cost savings and environmentally conscious motoring. Whether navigating city streets or cruising on the highway, the Minicab's efficient consumption rates highlighted its practicality and suitability for a range of driving scenarios.
Unveiling the Fuel Tank Capacity
Certainly, here's the detailed text about the "1999-2000 Mitsubishi Minicab 660 TL" focusing on its fuel tank capacity:The fuel tank capacity of the 1999-2000 Mitsubishi Minicab 660 TL was a crucial aspect that contributed to its practicality and convenience. Designed with efficiency and functionality in mind, the Minicab's fuel tank size struck a balance between accommodating sufficient fuel for journeys while optimizing its compact design.
Optimal Fuel Storage:
The Minicab 660 TL featured a carefully calibrated fuel tank with a capacity of 10.5 US gallons (8.7 UK gallons or 40 liters). This capacity was selected to cater to the vehicle's intended usage as a commercial van, balancing the need for extended driving ranges with the necessity to keep the vehicle lightweight and maneuverable.
Efficiency and Range:
With its fuel tank capacity, the Minicab was capable of covering substantial distances without frequent refueling stops. This was especially beneficial for urban delivery routes or small-scale commercial applications where time spent refueling could impact operational efficiency. The capacity allowed the Minicab to strike a balance between range and operational convenience.
Cost Savings and Practicality:
The Minicab's 10.5 US gallons fuel tank capacity translated into tangible cost savings for operators. The efficiency of the vehicle's engine and its lean burn MVV (Mitsubishi Variable Valve) technology meant that the fuel tank could provide an extended range, further contributing to reduced fuel expenses and operational costs.
A Perfect Fit:
The 10.5 US gallons fuel tank capacity was thoughtfully incorporated into the Minicab's compact frame. This design consideration ensured that the fuel tank seamlessly integrated into the vehicle's overall dimensions, without compromising its utility or maneuverability.
Conclusion:
The 1999-2000 Mitsubishi Minicab 660 TL's fuel tank capacity of 10.5 US gallons (8.7 UK gallons or 40 liters) played a pivotal role in enhancing the vehicle's practicality and operational efficiency. Designed to cater to the needs of commercial applications, the fuel tank size struck a balance between extended driving ranges and the vehicle's compact dimensions, while also contributing to cost savings and convenience for operators.
Dimensions and Sizes Overview
Certainly, here's the detailed text about the "1999-2000 Mitsubishi Minicab 660 TL" focusing on its dimensions and sizes:The 1999-2000 Mitsubishi Minicab 660 TL's dimensions and sizes were meticulously crafted to align with its role as a compact commercial van. Engineered to optimize space utilization and maneuverability, these measurements showcased the Minicab's versatility and practicality for a range of tasks.
Exterior Dimensions:
The Minicab's exterior dimensions were tailored for urban navigation and operational efficiency. With an exterior length of 339.5 cm (133.66 inches) and an exterior width of 147.5 cm (58.07 inches), the vehicle was designed to easily navigate through tight city streets and congested areas. The exterior height measured 177.5 cm (69.88 inches), ensuring that the Minicab could access low-clearance areas when needed.
Wheelbase and Ride Height:
The Minicab 660 TL featured a wheelbase of 220 cm (86.61 inches), contributing to its stable handling and compact turning radius. The ride height, set at 15 cm (5.9 inches), struck a balance between ground clearance and ease of entry and exit for passengers and cargo.
Weight and Seating:
Weighing in at 810 kg (1785 lbs), the Minicab was designed to be lightweight while maintaining structural integrity. With seating for two occupants, the Minicab prioritized cargo space and utility, making it suitable for commercial and utility-focused applications.
Turning Diameter and Doors:
The Minicab's maneuverability was further enhanced by its minimum turning circle of 4.4 meters. This allowed the vehicle to navigate through confined spaces and make tight turns with ease. The vehicle featured two doors, providing access to the driver and passenger areas.
Practicality and Compact Design:
The Minicab's dimensions and sizes underscored its practicality and suitability for various roles. Its compact design allowed it to fit into urban environments with ease, making it an excellent choice for deliveries, small-scale commercial activities, and urban commuting.
Conclusion:
The 1999-2000 Mitsubishi Minicab 660 TL's dimensions and sizes were thoughtfully designed to enhance its maneuverability, practicality, and adaptability. The compact exterior dimensions, coupled with a well-considered wheelbase and ride height, made the Minicab suitable for navigating tight spaces while providing ample cargo capacity. These dimensions, combined with its lightweight construction, reinforced the Minicab's identity as a utilitarian and versatile commercial van.
Wheel Options and Configurations
Certainly, here's the detailed text about the "1999-2000 Mitsubishi Minicab 660 TL" focusing on its wheel options and configurations:The wheel options and configurations of the 1999-2000 Mitsubishi Minicab 660 TL were designed to complement its compact size and utilitarian nature. These aspects not only influenced the vehicle's aesthetics but also played a significant role in its handling, stability, and overall driving experience.
Tire Dimensions:
The Minicab 660 TL featured tire dimensions of 145 R12-6PR. These tires were carefully selected to provide a balance between road grip, maneuverability, and load-carrying capacity. The 145 mm width contributed to stable handling, while the aspect ratio of the tire ensured a comfortable ride even when carrying varying loads.
Aluminum Disk Configuration:
The Minicab was equipped with standard aluminum disk wheels. These wheels were chosen for their lightweight nature and corrosion resistance. Aluminum wheels not only enhanced the vehicle's appearance but also contributed to improved fuel efficiency and handling by reducing unsprung weight.
Practicality and Handling:
The tire and wheel configuration of the Minicab 660 TL played a pivotal role in the vehicle's practicality and driving dynamics. The tire dimensions, along with the choice of aluminum disk wheels, struck a balance between load-carrying capacity and lightweight construction, contributing to the vehicle's overall efficiency and handling characteristics.
Conclusion:
The 1999-2000 Mitsubishi Minicab 660 TL's wheel options and configurations were designed with a focus on enhancing both aesthetics and performance. The carefully selected tire dimensions and aluminum disk wheels not only improved handling and stability but also contributed to the vehicle's overall efficiency and practicality. These choices underlined the Minicab's suitability for urban navigation, commercial use, and a variety of utility-focused applications.
Unraveling the Fuel Average (MPG)
Certainly, here's the detailed text about the "1999-2000 Mitsubishi Minicab 660 TL" focusing on its fuel average in MPG:The fuel average, often measured in miles per gallon (MPG), is a critical aspect of the 1999-2000 Mitsubishi Minicab 660 TL's design. This measurement quantifies the vehicle's efficiency in converting fuel into usable energy, providing insights into its cost-effectiveness and environmental impact.
Efficiency in Miles per Gallon:
The Minicab's impressive fuel efficiency was reflected in its miles per gallon (MPG) figures, demonstrating its ability to cover significant distances with minimal fuel consumption. With its lean burn MVV (Mitsubishi Variable Valve) technology and compact engine design, the Minicab achieved commendable fuel economy in both city and highway driving scenarios.
Fuel Consumption Modes:
The Minicab's fuel average was assessed under different driving conditions, represented by distinct fuel consumption modes. Under the 10/15 mode testing cycle, designed to replicate city driving conditions, the Minicab achieved a fuel consumption of 36.1 mpg US (43.4 mpg UK or 6.5 L/100km). This mode involved frequent stops and starts, mimicking urban traffic patterns.
In the 60 km/h mode, which simulated steady-speed highway driving, the Minicab excelled with a remarkable fuel consumption of 48 mpg US (57.6 mpg UK or 4.9 L/100km). This mode emphasized fuel efficiency during constant-speed cruising, highlighting the Minicab's potential for long-distance driving.
Practical Implications:
The fuel average, measured in MPG, had practical implications for operators and drivers of the Minicab 660 TL. Its impressive efficiency translated into reduced fuel expenses, making it an economical choice for businesses with frequent driving requirements. Additionally, the vehicle's low fuel consumption contributed to reduced carbon emissions, aligning with sustainability goals.
Conclusion:
The 1999-2000 Mitsubishi Minicab 660 TL's fuel average in MPG showcased its commitment to efficiency and practicality. With notable fuel consumption figures achieved under varying driving conditions, the Minicab exemplified its ability to deliver cost savings and environmental benefits. This emphasis on fuel economy made the Minicab a versatile and sustainable option for commercial use and urban commuting alike.
Trim Levels and Features
Certainly, here's the detailed text about the "1999-2000 Mitsubishi Minicab 660 TL" focusing on its trim levels and features:The 1999-2000 Mitsubishi Minicab 660 TL was available in distinct trim levels, each tailored to provide a balance of functionality and utility. While specific details about trim levels and features are limited, the Minicab 660 TL was designed to cater to the demands of commercial use and urban commuting.
Functional Trim Options:
The Minicab 660 TL was designed with a utilitarian focus, making it well-suited for small-scale commercial applications and deliveries. Its trim levels were carefully curated to offer essential features that aligned with the vehicle's role as a practical and reliable workhorse.
Commercial Features:
While detailed information about the specific features of each trim level is not readily available, the Minicab 660 TL aimed to provide a comfortable driving experience for both driver and passenger. Basic features such as a standard power steering system were likely included to enhance maneuverability, especially in urban settings.
Customization Possibilities:
As with many commercial vehicles, the Minicab 660 TL may have offered customization options for specific applications. Operators might have been able to tailor certain features or equipment to suit their individual business needs, allowing for flexibility in configuring the vehicle to accommodate different types of cargo or tasks.
Conclusion:
While specific details about trim levels and features are limited in available information, the 1999-2000 Mitsubishi Minicab 660 TL was designed with a utilitarian approach in mind. Its trim levels were likely designed to offer practical features and customizable options to cater to the requirements of commercial operations. Despite the limited information, the Minicab 660 TL's design and intended use underscored its suitability for urban delivery and commercial purposes.
Driving Experience and Handling
Certainly, here's the detailed text about the "1999-2000 Mitsubishi Minicab 660 TL" focusing on its driving experience and handling:The 1999-2000 Mitsubishi Minicab 660 TL offered a distinct driving experience that prioritized maneuverability, efficiency, and reliability. Its design and engineering were carefully crafted to ensure that the vehicle excelled in urban environments and small-scale commercial operations.
Urban Maneuverability:
One of the standout attributes of the Minicab 660 TL was its urban maneuverability. With compact exterior dimensions, a minimum turning circle of 4.4 meters, and a ride height of 15 cm, the vehicle was adept at navigating tight city streets, congested traffic, and confined parking spaces. These features made the Minicab a practical choice for deliveries and tasks that required frequent stops and precise handling.
Responsive Handling:
The Minicab's handling characteristics were tuned to provide a responsive and nimble feel. The vehicle's compact size and lightweight construction contributed to agile cornering and easy lane changes. These attributes allowed drivers to confidently navigate through urban traffic, enhancing overall driving comfort and efficiency.
Stable Ride:
While the Minicab's primary focus was on practicality and maneuverability, it also provided a stable and controlled ride. Its suspension system, including a McPherson strut coil spring front suspension and a semicircle leaf spring rear suspension, contributed to a balance between comfort and stability, ensuring that occupants experienced a smooth journey even over uneven surfaces.
Driver-Focused Design:
The Minicab's design took into account the needs of drivers who would be using the vehicle for extended periods. The inclusion of power steering as a standard feature simplified steering inputs, reducing driver fatigue during urban commuting and delivery routes.
Conclusion:
The 1999-2000 Mitsubishi Minicab 660 TL's driving experience and handling were geared towards optimizing urban navigation, maneuverability, and practicality. Its ability to navigate tight spaces, combined with responsive handling and stability, made it a reliable choice for city driving and small-scale commercial activities. The vehicle's design aimed to enhance the driver's experience while ensuring that the Minicab excelled in delivering goods and services efficiently and effectively.
Conclusion: The Legacy of the Minicab 660 TL
Certainly, here's the detailed text about the "1999-2000 Mitsubishi Minicab 660 TL" focusing on its legacy:The 1999-2000 Mitsubishi Minicab 660 TL left a distinct legacy that is still remembered for its utilitarian design, efficient performance, and practical features. This compact commercial van carved a niche for itself in urban environments and small-scale business operations, offering a reliable solution for various transportation needs.
Urban Mobility Champion:
The Minicab 660 TL's legacy was marked by its urban mobility prowess. Its compact exterior dimensions, agile handling, and maneuverability made it a champion in navigating city streets, where space and convenience were paramount. This urban-centric design made the Minicab a preferred choice for local deliveries, short commutes, and tasks that required frequent stops.
Efficiency and Sustainability:
Fuel efficiency was another hallmark of the Minicab's legacy. With its lean burn MVV (Mitsubishi Variable Valve) technology and economical fuel consumption, the Minicab was ahead of its time in terms of sustainability. Its ability to cover longer distances with minimal fuel consumption contributed to cost savings and a reduced environmental impact.
Practical Design for Business:
The Minicab 660 TL's legacy was deeply rooted in practicality. Its customizable features, essential amenities, and utilitarian interior made it a reliable partner for businesses. Whether used for deliveries, commercial activities, or small-scale operations, the Minicab offered a versatile platform that catered to various business needs.
Durability and Reliability:
The Minicab's legacy extended to its reputation for durability and reliability. Its design and engineering were focused on delivering a vehicle that could withstand the demands of daily use in urban and commercial settings. This reputation for reliability contributed to its continued popularity among businesses and operators.
Enduring Impact:
The 1999-2000 Mitsubishi Minicab 660 TL's legacy lives on as a testament to practicality, efficiency, and adaptability. Its impact on urban mobility, sustainability, and small-scale commercial operations is a reflection of its thoughtful design and purpose-driven features. Even though the years have passed, the Minicab's legacy continues to influence the way we perceive and use vehicles for practical and utilitarian purposes.
FAQ: Everything You Need to Know About the 1999-2000 Mitsubishi Minicab 660 TL
What are the key specifications of the 1999-2000 Mitsubishi Minicab 660 TL?
What engine powers the 1999-2000 Mitsubishi Minicab 660 TL?
How does the Minicab 660 TL perform in terms of fuel efficiency?
What are the exterior dimensions of the 1999-2000 Mitsubishi Minicab 660 TL?
Can you tell me about the Minicab 660 TL's suspension system?
What are the safety features of the 1999-2000 Mitsubishi Minicab 660 TL?
How practical is the Minicab 660 TL for business use?
What sets the Minicab 660 TL apart in terms of urban navigation?
What is the significance of lean burn MVV technology in the Minicab 660 TL?
Are there any notable features in the Minicab 660 TL's interior?
How does the Minicab 660 TL perform in terms of cost efficiency?
What is the legacy of the Minicab 660 TL?
Can the Minicab 660 TL be customized for specific applications?
How does the Minicab 660 TL handle different driving conditions?
What impact did the Minicab 660 TL have on fuel consumption?
How does the Minicab 660 TL's compact design contribute to its practicality?
Brian Wong / AuthorBrian Wong is an accomplished automotive journalist and editor with a passion for cars. With over a decade of experience in the industry, he has established himself as a trusted voice in the automotive community. Brian has written extensively about a wide range of topics in the field, from the latest trends in car design to innovative safety features and emerging technologies. As a senior reviews editor, he is responsible for test driving and analyzing the latest cars on the market, providing readers with accurate and objective reviews. His articles are widely read and respected for their depth of knowledge and analysis. Brian is committed to staying at the forefront of the latest developments in the automotive industry, and is dedicated to sharing his expertise and insights with his readers. |